After months of reporting by Rolling Stone, a trial declared "unethical" by WHO will not move forward. 🧵 www.rollingstone.com/politics/pol...
Post
In January, @katherineeban.bsky.social reported that HHS had given a $1.6 million grant to Danish researchers accused of “questionable research practices,” with internal emails showing it was a “funding priority.” More ↓ www.rollingstone.com/politics/pol...
In February, Rolling Stone reported on irregularities in Guinea-Bissau’s ethics review of the grant. The CDC’s former chief medical officer, Dr. Debra Houry, told us it’s “unfathomable that the CDC’s name is even implicated in this.” More ↓ www.rollingstone.com/politics/pol...
Earlier this month, Rolling Stone broke the news that the CDC decided to move forward with the previously shelved study, setting aside $1.6 million to help fund it with money directed by Congress for CDC global health security programs. More ↓ www.rollingstone.com/politics/pol...
And last week, we reported on how expiring funds had driven the rush to advance the study, in spite of the swirl of global criticism. WHO told us that regardless of revisions to the protocol, "The study is unethical.” More ↓ www.rollingstone.com/politics/pol...
This week, after months of criticism, the study failed to get the “necessary government approval” from Guinea-Bissau health authorities to proceed. More ↓ www.rollingstone.com/politics/pol...
2 reposts28 likes