Post

4/ But we can do more than just recreate the Twitter look and feel on Bluesky! Existing social media spaces aren’t designed for science: they’re noisy and are prone to collective attention warping due to hype and misguided amplification bsky.app/profile/shah...

bsky.appBlueskyThis is a heavily interactive web application, and JavaScript is required. Simple HTML interfaces are possible, but that is not what this is. Learn more about Bluesky at bsky.social and atproto.com.

6/ Goodreads is another inspiration for how “micro-knowledge” can aggregate into meaningful impact. As @aj-boston.bsky.social writes, why *don’t* we have something like Science Goodreads yet? bsky.app/profile/rone...

bsky.appRonen Tamari (@ronent.bsky.social)"Lack of Open Peer Review is Weird... A troubled scholarly article is similar to a contaminated head of lettuce: despite having inspection schedules and reporting mechanisms, the object and its…

1 repost12 likes

8/ AI is also a huge factor. While the idea of “micro-knowledge” has been around for a while (nano/micropubs), AI progress is driving a crucial realization that models need access not just to "sanitized" papers, but also the messy thought processes by which we arrived at them @seemaychou.bsky.social

9/ Finally, the silver lining in all the recent chaos (Science Twitter's decline, extractive platforms selling data to AI companies, funding cuts, etc) is the new space being created for rethinking everything, from how we publish to who owns our data

10/ Enter Semble. Imagine research "playlists," assessments like Science Goodreads, or a place to connect over share interests and find peers to explore research rabbit holes, together.