Post

🧵 New preprint! Towards Understanding Steering Strength w/ M. Taimeskhanov and D. Garreau Activation steering is a popular way to control LLM behavior at inference. But how much should you steer? We provide the first theoretical analysis of the steering strength α. 📄 arxiv.org/abs/2602.02712 1/7

Take contrastive prompts (for ex, safe vs malicious), evaluate them through the model, compute the mean difference of representations  at layer ℓ. That's your steering vector v. Then shift activations by αv at layer ℓ. Question: what does α actually do? 2/7

0 reposts0 likes

Result 1: Next-token probabilities have a bump shape. As α increases, most token probabilities rise, peak for α>0, then fall. In particular, off-target tokens peak _before_ target tokens. 3/7

Result 2: Concept probability follows a sigmoidal curve. The probability that the target concept appears in the output increases smoothly with α, following a tanh shape. Off-target concepts decrease or vanish. 4/7

Result 3: Steering always hurts global performance. Cross-entropy increases quadratically around α = 0, i.e., there's no free lunch. For large α, performance plateaus because the output becomes input-independent. 5/7

We validate everything empirically on 11 models (GPT-2, Gemma 3, Qwen 3, Llama 2, Mistral 7B) across 8 safety-related concepts. All our theorems are confirmed experimentally. 6/7