Post

Something I found interesting about reading this thread is that it made me wonder how many people think of ChatGPT as primarily a tool for writing things for you I use ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini possibly 100+ times a day and NONE of those uses are to produce writing that I then share with other people

Dara Lind@daralind.bsky.social

Maybe it will help a _little_ if I and others like me start saying publicly for the record that we just don’t use ChatGPT. Writing can be really hard — organizing a piece of writing can be especially hard — but I don’t use ChatGPT. If you read my stuff you’re reading something an LLM can’t do.

I wonder if I'm an outlier in this? Are most ChatGPT users leaning on it more for writing on their behalf? Aside from writing code and being a thesaurus I see it mainly as a curiosity engine - a tool for helping explore a weird, blurry, occasionally misleading but absolutely vast pool of knowledge

I can’t use ChatGPT to write because it doesn’t know what the fuzzy, half-formed ideas in my head are that I’m trying to crystallise into words. Until we hook LLMs up to telepathy machines it’s not much use. But it’s a good rubber duck to talk to about those ideas as a preliminary step.

I am convinced one of the most powerful workflows is to use a transcription model like Whisper over spoken word (from completely raw to very draft) and feed that in as context for LLMs for further exploration.

Something I've tried a few times is to dump a long draft blog post into NotebookLM and have the weird fake podcast hosts do an episode about it - I find it useful for checking that the key points I'm trying to make come across, and their interpretation sometimes sparks ideas for clearer explanations

0 reposts10 likes

No replies yet.