Post

ummmmm...fake sources, mischaracterization of findings, made up research studies doesn't sound like "Gold Standard Science" to us. But what do we know? We are just a lowly, grassroots community of the world's leading scientists. 🐸☕ #foolsgoldscience #standupforsciece www.notus.org/health-scien...

notus.orgThe MAHA Report Cites Studies That Don’t ExistThe Trump administration’s “Make America Healthy Again” report misinterprets some studies and cites others that don’t exist, according to the listed authors.

160 reposts582 likes

I asked ChatGPT to explain: The string ::contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1} is a kind of internal placeholder or annotation used by systems like mine during the generation of responses. It’s not meant to be visible to users but can appear occasionally due to a technical glitch or oversight.

ChatGPT also added … oaicite is likely shorthand for OpenAI Citation, a system that helps track, organize, and present references to external content consulted or cited during a response generation process. Its goal is to ensure that information provided by the AI is transparent and traceable

It sounds like they used AI and assumed that was good enough. It's scary that they will made life-changing decisions without due diligence. If they consider it government waste to actually have qualified people do important work, that's also a serious problem.

So Robert, the reason your papers are not being published by respected journals with thorough peer review is because you’ve banned your people from doing so, and not because your research is made up and wouldn’t stand up to the scrutiny of a kindergartner let alone peer review