Post

Whew. I can confirm that the people who aren't ready to talk about it *really* don't wanna talk about it. Many people will only accept violent rejection of LLM tech. And if you're doing anything other than that, you must be either the enemy or an ignorant rube.

Marco Rogers@polotek.bsky.social

Anil gets it. A lot of critics are still in their "put the toothpaste back in the tube" phase with AI. We are well past that. We have to address what it is today. But I also know that telling people this doesn't actually help them get past that phase.

Honestly, I think it's pretty much always like this. This is why tackling these ethical issues is so difficult. You can't expect most people to engage thoughtfully. And if we're blocked on that, we can't take action to protect them anyway.

the crypto part of your thread really resonated with me because i am 99% "yes crypto is bad." the 1% is the trans folks i know who describe it as a good way to, for example, get black market hrt. but i also didn't come to the "it's bad" stance without trying to actually learn about + engage with it

yeah and my worry is that 1% of folks don't understand exactly how hard it is to preserve opsec while using it for the purpose they think it's good for, which is going to land them in jail for fincrimes. cash is a better option a vast majority of the time for even that use case.

No replies yet.