Post

Who is Schrödinger's putin? A man who can end the war tomorrow, yet also can't [my latest op-ed in a 🧵 thread] Few medieval figures loom larger in 🇷🇺’s origin story than Yuriy Dolgorukiy, the prince who founded an outpost on the Moskva River from which russian empire arose 1/28

But the man moscow claims as a forefather is buried not in 🇷🇺, but in 🇺🇦 Dolgorukiy’s ambition was to rule Kyivan Rus from its true center – let the name be a hint. He died there as Grand Prince in 1157 and was laid to rest at the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra, which Russia struck on June 15 2/28

The barbarism of the attack crystallizes the very contradiction in which Russia's war is rooted. Putin oscillates between insisting Ukraine does not exist and dismissing it as a fabricated state, yet Moscow's own origin story keeps leading back to #Kyiv. 3/28

A shapeless, nagging terror has gripped russian rulers since time immemorial: the risk of discovering that what lacks meaning, substance, and coherence is 🇷🇺 itself, a fragmented empire of peoples #moscow colonized in a hurry, forever searching and never finding a unifying national idea 4/28

🇷🇺’s war-criminal-in-chief made the decision to invade 🇺🇦 But putin the puppeteer is also a puppet in the hands of russian imperial ethos. The instrument of Moscow’s efforts to reassert its right to rule over colonial possessions (aka Federation) 5/28 kyivindependent.com/the-banality...

kyivindependent.comThe banality of PutinIgor Bagnyuk, a lieutenant colonel in the Russian army, is not a household name. His work, at the vapidly named Main Computation Center of the General Staff, does not involve pulling triggers or tort...

The record leaves no ambiguity In 2014, on Putin’s command, 🇷🇺 troops without insignia appeared in #Crimea 8 years later, he ordered a full-scale invasion. Both were acts of aggression under the UN Charter/ choices made unilaterally by a tyrant who has spent 20+ years concentrating power 7/28

When Bashar Assad fell in 2024, #Putin simply informed his people that 🇷🇺 had, "in general," achieved its objectives. The absurdity of that statement was plain embarrassing. Having propped up the Assad dynasty from 1971, Moscow had lost its client. Yet the news was absorbed without difficulty. 10/28

The Kremlin’s justification for its war on #Ukraine keeps changing: protecting Russian speakers, “demilitarization,” “denazification,” NATO encirclement, then a civilizational struggle against the “Anglo-Saxons.” A regime that invents reasons for war so freely can invent one for ending it. 11/28

Russia occupies roughly 1/5 of 🇺🇦 The Kremlin could freeze the front and sell its gains as a historic triumph. In a country where citizenship brings neither rights nor duties, politics is a spectator sport. Most Russians would meet “victory” with relief, resignation, and a shrug. 12/28

🔴 Moscow's categorical imperative Most explanations for 🇷🇺's commitment to the war on 🇺🇦, in its 12th year, focus on regime survival. Putin cannot end the war, the argument goes, because he would appear weak before the siloviki, the security elites, who are the only constituency that matters. 13/28

🇷🇺 has never developed a reliable way to transfer power. Its tsars and commissars usually left office through death, palace intrigue or revolution. putin knows this history and has reason to fear for his life. Yet the specter of a coup explains his anxiety, not how the system itself works. 14/28

No replies yet.