Post

Inverse scaling of reasoning models a research collab demonstrated that there are certain types of tasks where all top reasoning models do WORSE the longer they think things like getting distracted by irrelevant info, spurious correlations, etc. www.arxiv.org/abs/2507.14417

2 reposts21 likes

it’s nuts to think how easy it is to do this to yourself and not realize it how many times did i use o3-mini-high bc i really just wanted that extra juice, that mini high, regardless if i really NEEDED it

That's very similar to what I can the "breakdown threshold": Especially with agents, there is a limit number of bullet points/instructions that you can feed to the LLM. Add just one more and everything falls appart (tool calls become unreliable AF, constraints are half-followed, etc)

The way I've found to get past this is to feed all the instructions (prompt, tools, etc) into a LLM and just ask to re-write all the prompts and documentation without useless or redundant instructions. Drops the prompt sizes massively (60~80% in my case) and makes a HUGE performance boost

Yup, it's obvious by now that the job of the agent is to manage the big picture, business rules and context curation