Post

interesting, i’ve heard of CAVs, but they always seemed more of a gray box approach. it seems like you could train a model to translate an embedding back into text. doesn’t seem like it would be too hard. also seems inevitable if we go all in on latent space

I believe the latent space almost always means that there's potential for more accessible information than just text with the space being continuously differentiable. I think of early days variational autoencoders that could be used to generate beyond training data

0 reposts1 like

But translating embedding back to text seems to me not necessarily straightforward. Where I've seen success is when comparisons are done with a 'well-understood' embedding. I can see conversion to text being difficult in a similar way that there doesn't exist perfect translation between languages