Post

new "is that canonical artwork even copyrightable" question: dan flavin's monuments to tatlin. someone appears to think it's a no! (i did not upload these, as likely as that seems) commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%2... commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%2... commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%2...

ian says DC statehood now

@wareian.com

under today's regime, i'd say no these would probably be rejected for several reasons (including threshold issues as it's really just simple geometry). and i'd hazard a guess that formalities were not followed here. still, that's not what zwirner and the flavin estate want you to think.

23/10/26, 10:30 pm0 reposts1 like

No replies yet.