Post

1. "Calcifying around a single model". Make it pluggable like search. 2. "To use the prompt API you must acknowledge Google's Generative AI Prohibited Uses Policy.". Yeah that's very bad. 3. "Overstated web developer position". Come on. Let's not create another iPhone moment for the web.

I'm curious what do you mean around point 3? I think it's good to point out that the bar for what some consider (or pretend to consider) as strong support, differs *a lot*. The issue with making the model pluggable is that sites might still design around a specific model that then can't be swapped

Our opposition here is against the API being proposed & (soon to be) shipped by Chrome. It isn't a statement against (or indeed, for) LLMs in general.

0 reposts2 likes

Makes sense. #2 is good reason to oppose! But my reply is to question about #3 in the tweet above+below. Data shows scale of opportunity. The risk is the web missing another iPhone-scale moment and losing a seat at the table. Can we survive missing the train a second time? bsky.app/profile/webd...

Firefox for Web Developers@webdevs.firefox.com

i think this maybe isn't actually an iPhone