Post

A good reminder that the field needs to think carefully about how we measure – both about how we conceptualise VWM, how we then operationalise "capacity", and then how we look for correlations between brain and behaviour. Big ups to the massive effort of all the labs involved!

I should also note my limited contribution to this project; I only contributed to the initial conceptualisation of the project and writing initial code for the task base. (In face, we/AwhVogelLab were barred from any data collection or analysis to prevent any bias of being original authors.)

Probably both. There is also a correlation between CDA and d' in the paper; it is similarly low (r = .13, n.s.) after removing one lab who had noisier data. I think a need for more robust behavioural and neural measures such that one could do individual differences sfuff reliably.