Post

"John Roberts is selling our future. he was appointed to SCOTUS because of his belief that Republicans should be above the law and that the presidency should be all-powerful so long as it’s run by a Republican" cmarmitage.substack.com/p/the-chief-...

disbarring John Roberts would be symbolic in nature and isn't legally actionable. but what it DOES do, right now, is put JR's objectively gross corruption on-record so Americans can see (and vote on) the whole of SCOTUS' "MAGA 6" profligacy big 🎩 @hackingbutlegal.bsky.social

I always say "words are little heroes" so rest assured "profligacy" was used very intentionally www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/p...

"chief justice 'Balls ’n Strikes' seems confused. he’s not supposed to care about the economic impact of a presidential initiative. he’s only supposed to decide whether the initiative itself is constitutional" @theshebeen.bsky.social do NOT let the Roberts scandal die. bsky.app/profile/whod...

Roberts is not an "umpire." John Roberts was not installed by Dubya Bush to call "balls and strikes™." Roberts spent his entire adult life searching for a way to nuke Voting Rights Act—with or without appearing racist @jaywillis.net for @ballsandstrikes.org ballsandstrikes.org/scotus/john-...

we really don't talk enough about John fucking Roberts exploiting election of our first black president (one our best in generations as it happens, faults and all) to CRAM PRE-PLANNED REAGAN AGENDA DOWN OUR THROATS using a nation's post-2008 collective euphoria as cudgel is sociopathic.