Post

No discussion of the psychopathy? First & foremost, she wasn't convicted b/c she put millions of patients at risk with fraudulent labs. It was all abt the stupid rich people & their money she took in as 'investments' meaning you're willing to lose it if the company goes bellyup. SHE'S A PSYCHOPATH.

Can you guys not put so many ads that it crashes the page every time I try to read the second half of the article? Who the hell needs this many head shots of Nathan when reading about what he said?

John Carreyrou, journalist who originally exposed Holmes’ fraud, gave his opinions on the documentary--that Holmes was trying to cast “herself as the neurodivergent entrepreneur who operated on a different wavelength,” but “the performance was no more convincing than her denials of wrongdoing.”