Post

“We have a belligerent teen in the White House now, and the Constitution isn’t structured to deal with him.” Kim Wehle writes about the gaping hole in the constitution that Trump is using to his advantage. Visit zeteo.com to read: zeteo.com/p/trump-has-...

62 reposts309 likes

More like he's behaving like a rich entitled 79-year-old man, which is, imagine that, exactly what he is. Maybe quit throwing shade at children and teens when talking about him, especially seeing as they are completely and utterly innocent in all this but will surely suffer the repercussions.

Trump tests and violates boundaries. Everything the Orange Moron is successful with, Democrats MUST leverage too when they get back into power! Democrats MUST stop with the Both-sideism! Because Republicans NEVER play by the same rules.

Concentration on trump/epstein keeps everyone in the dark about how PROJECT 2025 is close to total control, putting Vance in the presidency. Seems like PROJECT 2025 framers, Murdoch and Vance are trying to drive trump out before midterms. Need more PROJECT 2025 visibility in the media PLEASE!!!

The founding fathers did anticipate that a man of low morals and no principal might somehow become president. They argued about it in the Federalists papers. What they did not anticipate was that somebody so horribly flawed would make it through the electoral process. They had too much faith in us.

And that the Senate, the House and the Supreme Court would follow. Also I don't think it is Trump, but his handlers. Contrary to what he believes, he is not the sharpest knife in the drawer, by any measure.

I have to disagree with this Trump isn't a belligerent teen He's a narcissist and a psychopath I acted better than he does as a teenager and so did my kids and grandkids He's also suffering.from dementia

Know what else they didn't foresee Citizens using automatic weapons on each other, especially kids 45% of the population being dumber than a nail And, electing a man with the IQ of a rooster Can't blame them though, I didn't either

I disagree with the premise here. The problem is that “the constitution isn’t structured to deal with him”. The problem is that he is precisely what the founders conceived of as president: a temporary and non-hereditary monarch that would advance their interests as property owners.

I’m sorry, but I take offense at this. I have three boys and have seen them all through their teen years. Even when they were being belligerant, none were the wreckless baby that Donald Trump was and is.