Post

I would say they're going to have to become like an Amazon listing before most people notice. Also this kind of explains why I haven't heard of anything despite following news sites. I'll think "I've never heard of this at all." Lolol maybe I just didn't click it because its vague.

These headlines feel like they're AI generated. I also hate articles that bury the title of the show they're about. I promise I'll read the article if I know what it's actually about!

This is not the point here, obviously, and I do appreciate the article, but respectfully, shouldn't Emily Blunt at least be mentioned if you're naming the stars of Sicario?

I am doing my tiny part in hand-coding my own website without LLMs, tracking, ads, megabytes of unnecessary JavaScript, Google fonts, analytics, etc because that's what I would want. Nice side effect: The thing loads super fast! Downside: It's not finished for a while 🥲

this is all downstream itself of whatever nerds started formatting their culture & tv & film blogs with the runtime and directors and actors at the top. that showed up on seo analyses (but no one searched for it), and ai thinks that's how we categorize like amazon only having "author" under title

It's not about searching. It's about social media plugs. It's bitten me, so I get why it works. I think it captures as wide an algorithmic net as possible. You can bring in any people interested in any of the keywords in the title who are curious in what it is.

If the headline and slug says it's about Sicario, you only get it out to Sicario sickos. If it's about a writer and an actor and Westerns, you can get that post out to so many more feeds, and the bored and curious will click.

Maybe that just amps up the intrigue? Maybe adds variety so that they can do it for multiple combinations? My hypothesis is that it's all about seeing the headline in a social feed and enticing clicks, not searching.

The Google news feed on my phone is full of this crap. Long strings of inane drivel that exceed the character limit of the preview, somehow making it even less informative.