Post

I agree that we should have a lot more to show for it, but I think it might be worth taking a look at how San Francisco's museums, opera, symphony, music venues, sports venues, public transportation, and public spending compare to other cities of similar (or even greater) size

It's true that San Francisco has a lot more transit, sports teams, cultural institutions, etc, but most of them were built before the 2010's tech boom.

0 reposts18 likes

Sure, but SF also had the 1990s tech boom, the 1980s finance/corporate HQ boom, the post WWII economic boom, the WWII shipbuilding boom, the post-quake boom, the gold rush… San Francisco has arguably had immense wealth flowing through it since its name was changed from Yerba Buena to San Francisco

It's easy to take for granted all the things that wealth has afforded San Francisco. Granted, that doesn't mean that wealth has been distributed fairly or that there haven't been negative consequences, too. In some ways, this a microcosm of the present American malaise

I'm 100% for making MUNI (BART and AC Transit) service better, but if you look at SF transit next to almost any other US city of its size, it's leagues better And part of why we've been able to afford it is because San Francisco raises beacoup tax revenue from all the wealth that flows through it