Post

the problem is not that it’s free software (free to fork, free to study, free to modify) run by a rag tag group of maintainers - the problem is it’s the literal backbone of all modern digital infrastructure and should be considered “too important to fail”. So yeah, when rsync vibes, it’s concerning.

Andrew Lilley Brinker@alilleybrinker.com

Regarding the rsync thing: the software is provided as-is.

The societal importance or number of users of an OSS project doesn't change maintainers' responsibilities. The responsibility lies, as it always has, with integrators. OSS is "free as in puppy," and when you take a dependency you take the implicit responsibility to maintain it yourself if needed.

People can of course be concerned with rsync using AI with insufficient rigor, but at the end of the day it's up to the rsync maintainers to decide what level of rigor they deem appropriate, and they don't owe more than that to their users. If users are unhappy, they can contribute, fork, or leave.

0 reposts4 likes

No replies yet.