Post

Every conversation about bike lanes is like: "Car crashes kill a huge number of people every day, including pedestrians, cyclists, & car occupants. Good bike infrastructure has been shown to make everyone safer (& doesn't increase congestion)." "But sometimes cyclists break rules & hit people!"

I'm sure it is bad when cyclists intentionally do things that make themselves or others less safe but that is a completely unrelated conversation unless you're pointing out that good bike infrastructure makes it significantly less likely that cyclist behavior will impact other people in any way!

Exactly, I live in Amsterdam and cycling here is so simple because of the extensive and dedicated cycle routes. As a cyclist you rarely come into contact with cars, when it does happen it's always clear who goes where and with what priority, this makes it so much less stressful and dangerous.

When the cycle lanes program first started here in NL there were lots of angry protests but now the overwhelming majority agrees the quality of life, public health and shared spaces are better without cars in dominance

0 reposts8 likes

Yes, in Amsterdam if you are stopped on a bike by some lights it is usually for a good reason. There will always be rule breakers.

Having traffic lights that tell you how long till they change and designs that prioritize cyclists means you just don't feel you need to. I think dutch people generally behave more sociably compared to English people