Post

Every conversation about bike lanes is like: "Car crashes kill a huge number of people every day, including pedestrians, cyclists, & car occupants. Good bike infrastructure has been shown to make everyone safer (& doesn't increase congestion)." "But sometimes cyclists break rules & hit people!"

915 reposts6.3K likes

If you want an experience that will make you want to smash your head against a wall repeatedly, follow the bike lane discussions on Next Door. Many thousands of people dead from cars every year, but on ND the "almost" or "nearly" hit bicycle collisions are clearly the most destructive force.

Somebody will inevitably chime in with something like: "I've never even been close to being hit by a driver, but I've been struck by cyclists 8 times in the last year alone!"

They're still alive because they've not actually been hit by anything. They perhaps believe that their entirely made-up narrative is credible. Such is their hatred of cyclists and their need to shit-post.

I say “every serious cyclist has been in an accident with a car or will be in an accident with a car.” I mean, if you ride thousands of miles, you’re bound to [be] run into [by] a clueless or nasty driver. Sadly, it isn’t even thousands of miles. It’s more like “if you get on a bike…”

Friend who’s a hardcore cyclist (thousands of miles a year) has been hit 7 times. So far I’ve avoided anything serious. Some close calls that woulda been bad, and one driver that pushed me into a curb trying to use an unprotected bike lane to squeeze around a left turning car at low speed.

Hmm this is true, sometimes cyclists break rules...but so do cars. Are we going to a full train infrastructure? I would support it! Ban car and bike lanes!

Yeah I mean all the perceived annoying shit cyclists do is only because they're on the main road and don't have a lane of their own so they have no choice. Everyone wins with more infrastructure to support separating bikes and cars.

As a driver all I think when I hear this crap is: actually you hate driving. You resent is having to drive & can’t stand one more factor added to the mix of complex rules & attention-needing constant interactions that drivers must deal with responsibly. You probably don’t know how a stop sign works.

I genuinely think this is true of most drivers. They would rather devote as little attention as possible to driving, because it’s not something they choose to do or enjoy. If we ever figure out autonomous vehicles, the big improvement to road safety will come from stopping these people from driving.

My only problem with bike lanes, at least here in the USA, is HOW they're implemented. 9 times out of 10 something beneficial like bike lanes is hardly followed up with increased funding for public transit and/or increase of frequency. Not everyone CAN or wants to ride a bike to get everywhere.

Obviously it's better if there is also better public transit but even just making good bike infrastructure benefits everyone! Cyclists and non-cyclists alike!

I agree we should do things holistically but I don't think there's ever been a city council in America that has built bike lanes as a status symbol.

I always pull those conversations back to "let's build better infrastructure for all road users, not just cars" to try and stop the inevitable cars v bikes, who's the most dangerous shtick... When pedestrians, which everyone is like 99% of the time, are ignored entirely and die frequently

It's also funny. You'll get in the car with those same people and they'll spend the entire car ride nitpicking other people's driving while also breaking the law themselves half the time

💯. Good bike infrastructure makes it easier for us to follow rules. Contrastingly, dangerous or hostile roads with a lack of infra, create a selection bias for the most aggressive cyclists. Trying to withhold life saving infrastructure as some sort of punishment is misguided and cruel.

the longer i cycle, the more i engage in the kinds of behaviour that piss motorists off, because i've found the most dangerous position i can be in as a cyclist is trying to follow rules not made with my safety in mind

There was an initial piece of research about fifteen years ago which suggested that female cyclists had higher rates of collision and injury because they were more likely to follow rules. It was small scale, unreliable, and not repeated, because why would anyone be interested in that?

It's really not uncommon for what is legal, what is implied by the infrastructure, and what is actually safe to ride being completely different and contradictory things

One story of many: I ride as far to the right as I can to give cars maximum passing space. when it's unsafe I move to the center so they don't try to pass too close. on a hilly two-lane road with oncoming traffic i moved to the center. guy who couldn't wait 10s to pass had all day to argue about it.

I used to judge cyclists who rode up the inside of a column of stop-start rush-hour traffic. Then I realised that getting moving from a standing start is one of the most dangerous moments and staying in motion is sometimes essential to stay safe

There's a spot here leaving the beach, you have to merge across one lane of a freeway offramp to stay in the bike lane. I've tried it 1000 ways, but the safest seems to stop at the green and gun it when it turns red bc that's the only time there's a break in traffic. try explaining that to drivers

if i don't jump the light, motorists will pass me within inches, if not outright clip my handlebars. if i go anything less than 40 in a 30, motorists will try edge me out of my lane the safest position i can be in as a cyclist is in-motion, at as high a speed as possible

and very very in the motorist's way with no obvious means to "sneak by" me. yep yep. you gotta be in the way of the people so they pay attention to you and out of the way of the people who will never pay attention to you (ie people opening vehicle doors, coming out of buildings, alleys, or walking

I'm on my city's Bicycle Advisory Committee. I can't decide who is harder to talk to: residents who whine about the multimodal path being built out to the lake one slow mile at a time (Path to Nowhere they call it), or the city attorney who thinks all cyclists behave badly/are stupid.

The complaints about the multimodal path come from the same folks who complain about cyclists on the rural roads who sometimes impede their breakneck travel to and from town in their Child Killer 3000 pickups.

When I learned to drive in Ocean Beach SD, my parents, driving instructor and even the police told me, pedestrians and bicycles ALWAYS have the right of way, always! When I asked why, they just looked at me and repeated this. I wasn't the sharpest for my age but I figured it out!

as a cyclist and a driver, I consider bikes garbage trucks. If I wouldn't try to pass a garbage truck going that speed on this road in this neighborhood, I don't try to pass. and when I do pass i'm able to offer 6+ feet because i'm actually passing them. as a cyclist I take the whole lane

whenever a car trying to sneak by me would put me in a dangerous position. I also don't pass drivers on the right when i'm taking the lane; I am traffic at that point as a driver, you really aren't saving much time by passing, and you're opening yourself up to being passed on the right at the

Me too. If I need to take the lane, that's my position. I won't weave back to the kerb to sneak by, even if it's safe to do so. But if I'm riding in the gutter (as is required by law here in BC) in slow moving or stalled congestion, I'll be undercutting as many cagers as I can.

but cars have a human right to travel unimpeded at 35mph unless there is a car-based traffic-jam? A cyclist forcing them to slow down to 20mph for half a mile is inconsiderate, selfish, antisocial, privileged and ableist, and it should be illegal.

also, speed limits are stupid and people who adhere to them are bad drivers who should disappear from the roads. so should cyclists, tractors, etc, for slowing cars down. it’s like they’ve time-travelled here from the 1970s.

Some years back in my town a road-raging driver crossed into oncoming traffic *and onto a sidewalk* to deliberately try to run down a cyclist, and the general reaction was *still* basically "well the cyclist, being a cyclist, probably had it coming." It's surreal.

“Bikes run red lights you know!” Shut up with your giant pedestrian-plowing, cattle-catching, fossil fuel-guzzling nightmare machine that beeps and boops and has an individual tv for every passenger.

I ride a bike and the behaviour of other cyclists can be embarrassing, disrespecting rules of the road or perhaps not knowing them? pedestrians can also be thoughtless stepping out in front of you because they’re not looking and have earbuds in 🤷‍♀️ bike lanes help keep everyone safer 

and sometimes it's not even true, it's just car drivers not knowing biking traffic rules. so many comments about bicyclists running stop signs come from states that actually have bicycles treat them as yield signs

The other part is that the rules bikes sometimes break are often the ones blatantly made for cars and which are just nonsensical on a bike

If you really want to have some fun on a bicycle, ride up to the stop sign in a tall gear, take the lane, signal your turn*, come to a compete stop, DO NOT DOWN SHIFT, ride through the intersection from a dead stop in that tall gear, spend 15 minutes accelerating slowly through the intersection.

Turns out drivers never wanted me to stop for the stop, they just wanted to feel like they were getting where they were going faster, and once they see how much me on a bicycle can slow them down they hate that too. (Not instead, they are still mad about cyclists running the stop sign) *If turning

I had something annoying happen to me within, like, the first 2km or so of my long run on Saturday. Was crossing 2nd Ave in Manhattan at 111th street, with a fresh walk sign, and a reckless Citi e-biker blew his red light on what would have been a collision course if I hadn't been watching. 1/2

Me: "Bro!" Him: "Fuck off." Me: "No!!!" But did I brush it off and continue my run, barely thinking about it thereafter? Yes! Would I have been able to do the same if it was an SUV driver that had done that? Heck no! 2/2 (I cycle ridiculous mileage btw...)

It's not even "cyclists hit people" it's "occasionally I feel like a cyclist might hit me." It's all about how the poster feels fragile, with zero consideration of anything they might do to cause that feeling in others.

"A cyclist nearly killed me! There I was, running in the exact middle of a shared-use path on a Saturday at noon, just minding my own business..."

The level of perfection expected from a cross section of society before it can be considered is profound. Especially considering the pervasive scofflaw behavior amongst drivers. 🤷‍♂️

My cities sort of solution to this is that bikers are free to use bus lanes where they are available and they have been building more bike infrastructure and their are trails all over the place. It doesn't keep you off the road permanently but it certainly helps.

The one I just do not understand is the "Sharrow" marking - a picture of a bike with two chevrons indicating traffic flow direction. It seems like they delineate a... normal lane of traffic. Just with a sign that basically says "bikes exist:.

The idea is to remind drivers that bicycles are allowed to be in the middle of the lane if they wanted to and felt it was safest. But of course, since it's completely vague, it doesn't really mean anything to the people. who need that reminder the most, hahaha

If Americans get so in shape by riding bicycles everywhere that the average cyclist becomes capable of killing as many people at maximum bicycling effort as the average motorist can with mere inattention, we would be a nation of unstoppable supermen! Seems like a win/win.

Having just started cycling in a city that has really good cycle lane provision, the only time I've been close to hitting a pedestrian is when they were walking in the cycle lane and not on the pavement!

I visited a friend in Portland, Oregon in 2014 and spent 10 days bicycling around downtown. So many dedicated bike lanes! I noticed that 4 bikes take up about as much space as 1 car, and most cars have fewer than 4 occupants. Bike lanes saved space and reduced congestion. You could see it plainly.

As a car driver and cyclist I really support bike lanes, they make it safer for cyclists AND drivers. 🤷‍♀️ It's win win. It's also easier to promote biking in a city if its easy and safe to do so 🤷‍♀️

also it sucks to get stuck behind a cyclist in a car! it's hard to safely pass them! it feels like some drivers solution to this problem is the complete elimination of cyclists rather a solution that ultimately will benefit everyone

As a pedestrian, the times the bikes have scared me the most is when they were doing things where they could have been hurt. Like the guys who made a left on red across the lane where I'd once seen a car run the red over 35. Or the dad teaching two kids not to look a half mile from a memorial bike.

Admired a father taking his three kids biking today. Turned to rage seeing him taking them through a four way stop without slowing down.

i was hit by a biker full force once, i just got some bruises and was a bit upset. i saw a woman get hit by a car once, she broke her leg and was taken away by an ambulance. id much rather get hit by a bike over a car!!!!!

One of the neat things about where I live is there are a lot of paths completely separate from roadways for long stretches. Wide enough and with well established rules for sharing. Bike lanes w/o a hard barrier require trusting lots of drivers with your life.

I lived in San Francisco for about five years in the 00s. PLENTY of bikes, and many technically violated the law. I walked by preference. I did NOT fear cyclists, it was the cars/SUVs/et al blowing stop signs, et cetera who were the real threats. THEY were the killers. 🤬

It doesn't even make sense as an argument against bike lanes. If cyclists are so dangerous then surely it makes sense to banish those menaces to their own dedicated lanes where they can only crash into each other? Oh, no! That's not the conclusion we were aiming for!

En France, les accidents de la route tuent près de 3 500 personnes par an, dont 10% cyclistes ou piétons. Un réseau cyclable sécurisé réduit ces accidents de 30 à 50%, sans aggraver la congestion. Le projet #VisionFrance2050 propose un plan national de voies protégées, financé…

Based on online cycling discourse, I have learned... - When cyclists use the road, people complain they should be on the pavement. - When cyclists use the pavement, people complain they should be on the road. - When cyclists use dedicated bike lanes, people complain those lanes shouldn't exist.

I will say that riding a bike on a shared use pedestrian/cyclist path changed some preconceptions I had about cyclists. People walking full-speed nose down in phones, or pointedly ignoring all my calls behind them, then still casting dirty looks when I pass so slowly I’m barely remaining balanced.

Aye, I'm always really careful if I have to go on a pavement. Roads are the same though. I banged someone's car as they pulled out on me and they were like "why did you do that, I thought I hit someone" 🙄. Also at least one pure roadrage pass a day from filtering at traffic lights.

And I’ve even tried the solution of getting off the bike and walking it past groups of pedestrians walking 3-4 abreast and taking up the whole path, but even then, repeatedly, I’ve passed, then in the time it takes to get on my bike and push off they’ve overtaken and are walking in front again.

two weeks ago in NYC I saw a headline like "teen killed in e-bike collision with SUV, drawing fresh scrutiny of e-bikes" No one stopping to ponder why SUVs are driving on the densest urban streets in the western hemisphere and instead blaming the child riding a bike.

Lol we all know the stereotype of walking the streets of Amsterdam or Copenhagen. It's like living through the purge trying to walk for coffee in those notoriously dangerous cities without motor vehicles. Just like everyone knows Aussie school shootings increased after gun regulation, too, right?

"You can't have a bike lane, where would the cars go?" "OK, if I don't have a safe bike lane, I will be in the middle of the normal traffic lane, where I am the most safe" "NO, not like THAT! I WILL KILL YOU if you're in my way!"

The US also has third world car safety standards because protecting pedestrians and cyclists in an accident is not a priority. The death rate for pedestrians and cyclists in US motor accidents in US in 3 times the rate of countries like Australia that us international safety standards.

That’s such a lazy deflection. The occasional cyclist breaking a rule doesn’t erase the fact that safer bike infrastructure protects everyone from the far greater danger of car crashes.

I'm sure it is bad when cyclists intentionally do things that make themselves or others less safe but that is a completely unrelated conversation unless you're pointing out that good bike infrastructure makes it significantly less likely that cyclist behavior will impact other people in any way!

It's an exhausting conversation because people killed by bikes are in the single digits, if that But cars are just slaughtering people. Twice the amount of homicides, all causes

in my experience, the less cyclists are treated like other vehicles on the road, the more apeshit behavior I see where there's bike lanes and lots of cyclists, they behave like their bikes are vehicles on the road. where there's none (where I am now) they're always on sidewalks and against traffic

and the cars? well, the cars here are murder machines that ignore every traffic law. speeding in 25 mph zones every minute of every day, no turn signals, weaving, hostile driving, going into every "DO NOT ENTER" they see because they're toddlers with mall crawlers, etc.

I don't know how to discuss your experience because I don't know what kinds of detailed records you've kept but if you look at the research and data from people who professionally study this stuff, it's abundantly clear that better bike infrastructure means more safety for everyone.

Im not sure it is an unrelated question. For instance, what do we mean by “make everyone safer”? If we say good bike infrastructure means pedestrians are merely being maimed by cyclists than killed by cars, are we counting that as a win because fewer people have died therefore the street is safer?

"If we say good bike infrastructure means pedestrians are merely being maimed by cyclists than killed by cars, are we counting that as a win" Yes. Even that would be a win. (But that isn't the claim.)

i think ur falling into the nirvana fallacy. "bikes still injure pedestrians sometimes" is not a reasonable counter to "more bike infrastructure will dramatically reduce pedestrian deaths". Even if you disagree on what "good bike infrastructure" is, that's also not an argument against the premise

I'm struggling to understand what you want to communicate, here, because I don't know what you're arguing we would do differently in a world where we *do* consider bad cyclist behavior relevant to whether good bike infrastructure makes people safer...

My best guess is that someone who really wants to prevent people from being maimed by badly-behaved cyclists, even at the expense of more car deaths, would call for an absolute abolition of bike infrastructure? Like I really don't understand what lever you want to move, here.

…yes? But absolutely everyone who seriously discusses multi-use infrastructure is clear on the fact that cycle lanes should be separated from both cars and pedestrians.

I bike and where I live it’s legal to bike on the street and on the sidewalk, but you’re required to follow the law as a vehicle or pedestrian, respectively. The problem with some cyclists is that they switch between sidewalks and roads and assume they have the right of way in every situation.

Yes (because most of the “breaking the rules” that happens is because the lack of good infrastructure makes following the rules either less safe or less convenient)

I’m not a cyclist, but as someone who spends a lot of time walking from place to place, and sees how cyclists behave on streets with poor infrastructure, this makes sense to me.

So much this. I live in a town of 14k, which means almost NO bicycle infrastructure and a lot of the weirdness from ME is that there is just no safe reasonable option in a HUGE number of cases bc everything is built for cars with token gestures (at best) for pedestrians and NO options for bikes.

yet so many chose to still ride on sidewalks or against traffic and somehow the only argument cycling enthusiasts can come up with is "well, would you rather be hit by a car" 😂

I got hit by someone on a bike once. I was grumpy after, sore, and I went home to take some Advil and rest for the night. There was a kid I went to school with who got hit by a car. He died. The difference between the two is massive and anyone who acts like they’re comparable isn’t being serious.

A few years ago I saw a bike/ped collision (in Cambridge). I think the bicyclist was in the wrong. Both people went down. Both got up and cursed at each other … and then walked away. I think the cyclist had some broken equipment and I think the pedestrian was happy with that outcome at least.

Whenever someone says "I almost got killed by a bike" I ask them when the last time someone crossing in a crosswalk in Massachusetts was killed by someone riding a bike. (It's a trick question because it has never happened.)

I've been hit by a bicycle too. They were gone by the time I realised what had happened. Lucky for me, and for you, Jared, we were able bodied enough to get up after. Make no mistake, no one compares cycle accidents to car ones AND pedestrians deserve to be safer.

I'm pro-bike lanes, and will support them anywhere, on any road, but I am adamant that they should not be on sidewalks. I saw a bicyclist hit a woman walking out of a restaurant and slam her into a brick wall and nearly killed her. Dude hopped on his bike and rode off. Not for sidewalks

I'd hate to see where you'd place 9-yr-olds who just want to ride to school. Don't need you to be 'pro' anything beyond prioritizing the safety of vulnerable road users. Maybe start by decoupling our dependency on single-occupancy vehicles as a make-work project. That would help a lot.

Yup. For some reason, humans on bicycles are incredibly dangerous to humans on foot. If you remind one that their bell is to alert pedestrians to their presence not for "get out of my way" they dont like it.

Btw what’s your opinion about cars driving on the sidewalk? It’s about as relevant to bike lanes as bikes on sidewalks

Then you go somewhere like Washington DC where there are bikes on all the sidewalks and everyone expects them and it works just fine.

When there is good and safe bike infrastructure people don’t usually use the sidewalks for bikes. Doing so is usually a sign there isn’t really a place for bikes and the cyclist doesn’t feel safe. (Understandable, Americans in cars pay fuck all attention to the road.)

Yes, that's right, bike infrastructure should be built in space taken from motor vehicles and pedestrians should retain their place at the top of the transport infrastructure pyramid.

They're very rarely sidewalks. People often think they're on the sidewalk because they're used to a division of road-pavement, but they're very clearly demarcated as separate. Town where I live has a few alleys that can't have them separate so it's clearly marked to go slow or dismount.

This is WHY there should be bike lanes! I am comfortable riding in traffic. Many cyclists especially kids are not. Given a binary choice of a road or sidewalk many will chose the sidewalk. It doesn't have to be so.

It's rare that any bike infrastructure is on a sidewalk; the presence of any such marking is a failure by authorities. (I'm excluding "multi-use paths" in parks and on bridges from this) Almost always, bicycles and pedestrians should not have to share narrow, hemmed-in spaces.

Yup -- if people are in amongst pedestrians and moving faster than them, whether they're on bikes, mobility scooters, or skateboards -- there have to be some rules in place. Especially if they're coming up behind people without any warning.

I need you to understand that people only bike on sidewalks when the streets are too dangerous to bike on (because of cars). If you don’t like bikes on sidewalks you should be advocating for bike lanes. This should not be confusing or surprising.

It's infuriating because it's such basic frickin' physics So many people are intrinsically car-brained and anti-bicycle and they're not even aware so they say utter nonsense and vote terribly

If I'm driving and I hit a cyclist/pedestrian, even if the other person was 100% at fault and no driver could prevent the impact, that still means a lot of things I don't want to experience happen. I would like cyclist & pedestrian infrastructure to prevent this.

Even from the selfish POV, I do not want to hit people with my car, even if it was because they were being reckless idiots. They also would like not to be hit by my car. Designing transit to minimize this is win-win.

I got run over, when I was 4 years old, by a very angry German man who scolded me for getting run over. If it had been a car I wouldn't be posting about it 20something years later.

In college, another student rode the wrong way around a bike roundabout and t-boned me. She sent me flying off my bike, and afterwards I had her tire marks as red tracks up my side. I picked myself up, she apologized, and we both went on our ways. If she'd been driving a car instead I might be dead

Exactly, I live in Amsterdam and cycling here is so simple because of the extensive and dedicated cycle routes. As a cyclist you rarely come into contact with cars, when it does happen it's always clear who goes where and with what priority, this makes it so much less stressful and dangerous.

When the cycle lanes program first started here in NL there were lots of angry protests but now the overwhelming majority agrees the quality of life, public health and shared spaces are better without cars in dominance

and then often when you dig into the incidents where cyclists hit people you find out that it was because the bike lanes were made impassable for bikes or cars were mis-using the bike lane, forcing cyclists to ride elsewhere. or pedestrians ignored clear markings and walked into the path of cyclists

(lost track of how many bike lanes i've seen (in person or pics) where you have to ride through permanent road signs, or impassable curbs across the lane.. or which were located along the wrong side of a road forcing cyclists to cross traffic.

In my city, bikes are expected to follow the same road rules as our motorized counterparts - including "no traveling on sidewalks". There are, of course, always a few idiots who don't do this -- just like the couple of dozen vehicles I see every day calmly cruising right through hard red lights.

Cyclists (in cities especially) definitely do a lot of annoying shit, but I really think the majority of that bad behavior is necessitated by urban design that is hostile to bikes. Like yeah, bikes on sidewalks are bad. Cyclists don't do that when there are protected bike lanes available though!

The key thing is that even "But sometimes cyclists break rules & hit people!" implicitly recognises that there is a hierarchy - all road users have a responsibility to protect the more vulnerable, and even careless cyclists can only really harm pedestrians. Unlike motorists, who are a danger to all

Yeah like I hate people biking (and especially e-biking at full speed) down the sidewalk, but there would be less of that if it was actually safe to bike on the road.

It's like "men are afraid women laugh at them, women are afraid men will kill them". Cycling is a way for even white men to feel a little oppression. (But it's their own fault, they could just have a car)

It's so frustrating, because at the end of the day a car accident is orders of magnitude more dangerous for a pedestrian than a bike accident. Every attempt to move bicycles onto roads and treat them as cars makes me pull my hair out.

Anecdotally, I see a lot of cyclists deciding whether they are cars or pedestrians or fully-above-the-law depending on the convenience of the situation. Like shooting diagonally across an intersection, last second, because they can.

Anecdotally I have been almost run over by cars driving against the lights and through intersections which I, as a pedestrian, am allowed to cross. It is like these drivers of cars and trucks think they are fully above the law! Maybe we should ban cars until we figure this out.

but that’s a 100% logical response to a system that alternately requires you to be a car or a pedestrian, based on whichever is more convenient to other people, and often at the risk of your own safety.

intersections are the scariest part of cycling in the road, getting a head start on traffic and not having to start moving alongside them when the light turns is a huge moment of risk mitigation. people will break rules when it has a good chance of preventing injury or death.

My main frustration is many of the bikers in my community often treat local laws and regulations as 'suggestions' or ignore them completely, as if the act of choosing healthier, environmentally conscious transportation puts you on a pedestal and affords you the right to be an asshole.

my main frustration is almost all drivers speed, almost all park illegally, almost all look at phone / screen, as if act of choosing laziest option with dreadful environmental & health impacts on OTHER poeple puts you on a pedestal of no responsibility or consequences of choice to be an asshole

but you totally are by, 'look squirrel'. The dangers & risk posed by drivers, which research shows break the law considerably more, is so ingrained & accepted, you change discussion to something irrelevant. Until cyclists cause damage & injury that vehicles do your 'feels' are a touch irrelevant

I’d want to see ALL of the data and methods, as well as confounders, before making bold statements based on an article about a study in a bicycling magazine. There’s a big difference between letter of the law and actual safety. Example: cars rolling stop signs with no one around, illegal but safe.

Point is, frequency of breaking traffic laws is vastly different than talking about pedestrian and cyclist safety. And hypocritical for most cyclists for most of regulated road history.

also, I'm aware that confirmation bias is very real, but it's still not surprising to me to read in that study that the data in the U.S. is not yet strong. (the U.S. is unusually full of assholes)

I don't doubt the statistics, but a proper response from bikers is NOT to say: "we do this less, so it's somehow more acceptable." It's easy for me to admit that a lot of drivers are shit at driving but very few bikers seems to be willing to admit the same about bikers.

Irresponsible driving is significantly more dangerous to other road users and nearby infrastructure than irresponsible cycling, which is part of why the law and society tend to treat the two activities differently.

If that's how you see it man I don't know what to say to you. All the best to you and please don't kill anyone on the road.

I routinely watch two or three cars in a row blast through red lights. Almost nobody obeys the speed limit. Lots of people continue to use their phones while driving. Oh, and that 4 foot safety zone for bicycles is a joke.

Local laws were made for cars, and obeying the rules as a cyclist makes everyone less safe. Do you really want me and 9 other cyclists stopping at a stop sign and proceed one at a time? It's safer (though illegal) for us to slow down and proceed through an intersection together when there is a gap.

If you're the car directly behind my group, you want to wait ten cycles at a 4-way stop? Should we each clip out and put a foot down before we proceed? Are you joking? This is the sort of thing that gets cyclists run over by road ragers, and makes nobody safer.

the people who lose their minds when a small handful of cyclists flout laws and do things that are annoying and dangerous are going to be so mad when they find out about cars!

Around here, we have this progression: "We should have more separated bike lanes so people do not get hit by car doors." "That doesn't happen!" Followed by someone being killed by getting hit by a car door: www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/ne... I really do not like it.

cbsnews.comCyclist dies days after being hit by car door in St. Paul, police sayA cyclist died days after he was struck by an open car door in St. Paul, Minnesota, late last month, according to police.

There are places I have to take the whole “car” lane to avoid being shoved up against the parked cars and I always wish I had a big sign on my back explaining this to the cars behind me

I made the mistake once of riding beside a line of parked cars. A driver suddenly opened his door in front of me. I had no time to react. My front wheel smashed into the door, and I went flying over it. Fortunately, I got away with a few scrapes and bruises. My bike didn't fare as well.