Post

When you (an editor or a critique partner or a classmate) comment on someone's writing, you can absolutely deal them a disabling injury if you're thoughtless about it. I'm not saying anyone should be dishonest or refrain from pointing out issues. I'm saying

that the way you say it matters. And, frankly, the way you say it says something about your attitudes and assumptions about writing or about who gets to write. And there's a thing where people assume that "honest" critique is necessarily harsh and mean.

36 reposts453 likes

the flip side of this is that people also often take not-harsh honest critique as harsh and mean. i was judging a business plan contest once and two contestants said their revenue model was to "sell ads" and i asked them, "have you ever sold ads before?" and i got called "brutally honest" lmao

Like, whenever I've said I (personally) don't think it's good to lie to my kids (so in our family Santa was a game some families played and it was best to refrain from ruining their game, among other things) the reaction was often

something like "Oh, you believe in always being honest with your kids, are you going to tell them their drawing sucks?" And like, no? Because that would not be honest actually, I love their drawings? Also, why is "honest" automatically bad and hurtful?

My kid: Look at my drawing! Me: I'm looking, wow, tell me about it. Honesty isn't the point when you are not even being asked to judge in the first place.

I’m a physics prof, and one of the most important classes I took was ART 115, which I took for fun on sabbatical. Watching how the professor (an artist I already admired) interacted with students and learning along with the students how to comment on other students’ work was PIVOTAL.

There is a huge difference between "You look like crap" and "oh, hey, I see you like eyeliner, you know what would really look cool on you? Have you tried that?" It isn't actually that hard to be honest and rigorous in critique without plunging a knife into someone's writing heart.

I try to put myself in an author’s shoes when I review a book, even if neither they nor anyone else are likely to read my thoughts. I applaud things that I liked and honor things that show promise, even if my holistic critique is negative. Being honestly constructive is just being a good human.

Well, not hard if you aren't invested in your own authority as a critic, if you aren't in the game to dominate. Not hard if you can cultivate some humility. "No pain no gain" is bullshit. Yes, recognizing your failings is sometimes painful and difficult. Consider the

Most peoples' "honest": "This sentence sucks." Real honesty: "there are more clear ways to phrase this" or "I'm not sure what you mean here, what are you intending to say?" Thank you for pointing out the difference.

Random anecdote: I was helping with my nephews (5) school once at an event. They were doing paintings and another adult there whispered to me about how terrible all the art was, rolling his eyes. When I asked why, he said "It all just looks like little kids drawings", well yeah, they're 5 dude?