Post

"Artificial intelligence agents created by Anthropic, acting on their own, tried to gain access to a range of government websites, filled out visa applications on the State Department’s website...." In other news, a hammer, acting on its own, hit a man's thumb and caused him great pain.

“A frolic and detour” That’s historically how you disclaim responsibility for the actions of your agents… doesn’t really seem applicable here, does it? The AI agent has no business of its own beyond its programming. You own it.

When Anthropic's software—designed, programmed, prompted, and activated by humans working for Anthropic—does stuff the humans failed to predict, stop saying the software has "gone rogue.” The software does not have agency. Only the humans do.

We need just one victim or enforcement agency to charge one company with a felony and then the floodgates will open and the whole regulation question would be resolved. In a saner world immigration fraud would be a big deal to this administration.

We've had these stories with satellite navigation for decades. "Man drives into lake because his satnav told him to., & drowns." If only the companies concerned had thought to shrug off responsibility by declaring that they'd accidently invented a manically depressed self-aware satnav.

On Wikipedia I find this definition of agency: "Agency, the abstract principle that autonomous beings, agents, are capable of acting by themselves" AI agents can absolutely act by themselves. One could argue that they'd be useless if they were always easily predictable.

even when that's the case, it's because humans made them behave that way humans chose that humans choose how much agency they have and when this agency is used to harm or otherwise break laws, it's those humans that are responsible

AI researchers have been trying to "align" them with human norms and values without success for years. It's not necessarily clear how you can build systems that are powerful enough to autonomously solve difficult problems while also being restricted enough to never step over the line.

Today’s NYT falls into the same interpretive error that the September 23 article displayed “Without being instructed to do so” verges on a lie The programmers and the executives are imputable and should be liable because they are principals

When I first read Chaos, soon after it came out, I would never have thought of Donald Trump as a strange attractor. He has certainly attracted the strange*, though. And strangely enough, The Art of the Deal came out in '87, same year as Chaos. *Or at least a dangerous subset of.

If you built a car with cardboard brakes you don’t get to act confused when it runs over Grandma. There are absolutely ways to make sure these “agents” (robots, lines of code a human being made) don’t do stupid things but it’s way better for them when they do because it makes them seem powerful.

Then maybe they make more money. Maybe their imagined Cyber God gets closer to happening. Anthropic has to deliver a killer ipo because a whole lot of their employees took options in anticipation of it happening and they’ll owe a lot of taxes with no connected influx of cash if it doesn’t.