Post

The CEOs who bent the knee and chose to settle with IQ47's Reich are learning the lessons that Chamberlain's Appeasement taught us almost a full century ago: You cannot appease authoritarians. Once you've given into one thing, they'll demand the next, and the next, and so on.

The same logic is used when a company offers a substandard or even dangerous product. Someone at PWC creates a spreadsheet comparing present worth (costs) of various options and a C-suite officer chooses the least expensive alternative. All those emails about corporate values are 🐂💩

Elon Musk – $500 billion. Larry Ellison – $393 billion. Mark Zuckerberg – $270 billion. Jeff Bezos – $237 billion. The richest man on the planet owns X. The second richest man in the world is about to buy TikTok, and his family could soon take over Paramount and Warner Bros.

The third richest man owns Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp. The fourth richest man owns The Washington Post. Four men. Nearly $1.4 trillion accumulated in private coffers. And they all own the platforms that shape what you see, what you hear, and what you believe.

It's a effective way to quasi-legally solicit a bribe, isn't it? File a 'lawsuit' and then shake someone down for a 'settlement'. It wasn't even slightly hidden. "Are we reviewing your merger? It'd be a shame if something happened to that approval while we're in court.....".

They hire these elite white shoe law firms with hotshot 7 figure lawyers, and their best advice to these companies is to settle because they think fighting the federal government will be too costly, completely ignoring the flimsiness of the cases in the first place. Legal malpractice

That's Donalds way, he was taught by the best! frivolous lawsuits, bribery,shakedowns,intimidation was Roy Cohen 🍊💩was such a good student he even took down his mentor. Reading Epstein emails everyone in that world marvels by how corrupt 🍊 was/is but like to hang onto his coat tails to make money.