Post

personally I think it's a very big deal that the Canada bureau chief for the @nytimes.com — certainly one of the highest-paid journalists in the country — asked an unspecified "AI tool" what Poilievre said & published its AI-hallucinated quotes in her reporting.

Blake C. Stacey

@blakestacey.myatproto.social

8 May

Meanwhile, on Wikipedia: "If you have a history of AI use, we will expunge everything you have added since ChatGPT went live, because nuking you from orbit is the only way to be sure" (paraphrased) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikiped...

en.wikipedia.orgWikipedia:Presumptive removal of AI-generated content - Wikipedia

ave

@ave.zone

That's not what it says though. If you have a history of AI *editing*, if certain conditions are met, people can revert your edits *from the point they deem as when you started doing AI editing*, and you can revert and take responsibility for the content (far from "nuking from orbit").

9/5/26, 9:21 am0 reposts8 likes

No replies yet.