Post

simonfj.eurosky.social
@simonfj.eurosky.social

Hi @caesar.dev , Guys, Thought you may be interested in this comment about the inter-networking between PDS operators. mu.social/profile/simo... I keep coming back to this (potential) org as the coordinator across the atmosphere. blog.plcred.org/3mwlphq42d227 Bit like watching AT&T being reborn 😶

blog.plcred.orgFirst steps of the PLC organization
simonfj.eurosky.social@simonfj.eurosky.social

That was interesting. You didn't mention the other PDS operators had no reciprocal arrangements. No mention of "network services" on bsky.app/settings or blacksky.community/settings So who coordinates the development of inter-network services?

bsky.appbsky.app
Caesar
@caesar.dev

An association of PDS operators is an interesting idea, but it is not the purpose of the plcred.org. Their sole purpose is to be an independent entity to manage the plc.directory. In principle PLC is not Atmosphere-specific. It is a DID type which could be used by anyone for any purpose.

0 reposts0 likes

simonfj.eurosky.social
@simonfj.eurosky.social

Well. Not "sole purpose". Its a starting point. We can agree to disagree on this one point. And technically, re: DID, you're quite correct. But "the networks have started to talk". The directory is one commonly shared INTEROPERABLE resource. Should have seen the early days of WC3.