Post

i know. it's the #1 thing yall have been asking for. it's a Bluesky meme. every time we post something, people reply "edit posts wen?" we see you. we have always seen you. so why haven't we shipped it?

there are various safety and spam risks, but the core problem is this: someone writes "puppies are the best 🐶", racks up engagement, then edits it to say something horrible or swaps in a link to a malicious site. now people look like they endorsed it.

this gets especially ugly with reposts and quote posts. plus, post editing adds more complexity and required tooling for our T&S team. so if we do this, we'll need guardrails.

here's what we're thinking: 1) you have 5 minutes to edit a post 2) you can only edit each posts once 3) images and videos can’t be edited 4) a prominent "edited" badge appears on the post 5) version history is visible to everyone 6) your account has to be at least a week old

some of these are tough tradeoffs. 5 minutes won't catch the typo you spot two hours later. one edit means you can't fix the fix. we know. it's the price of mitigating these risks and keeping people safe here. and this is what might be feasible for our small team.

i use editing all the time on mastodon to sort of do moderation on big threads, like if a post gets 30 replies about THING and I've heard enough, I'll edit it to say like "edit: please no more replies about THING" it's a nice alternative to locking the thread

Yes! So maybe it's ok for edits inside 5 minute window to be like @alexbenzer.com described. But after that, edits will be shown below... As sort of updates on that note, rather than change. UPD: something like this, but as a distinct UI element

0 reposts0 likes

TBH, it seems to be a separate feature. You can "edit" in first 5 minutes, and after that you only can "add an update" which is like another post, but pinned tightly to the original one, to make sure it will be seen