excited to check out Wolverine for myself today (good or bad š) wrote about what I was seeing in reviews here: jakesteinberg.substack.com/p/perfectly-...
Post
Jake, I'd like to ask. Are you aware of Substack's stance re: hosting nazi newsletters and articles on their site? Instead of taking this content down and banning the accounts that post it, the platform has simply continued taking its cut of their revenue. www.theguardian.com/media/2026/f...
I've been a fan of the pod for a while now and you and Peter's work holds great value for meābut that's exactly why I feel I *have* to ask. Have you considered hosting your personal writing on a different platform? If not migrate outright just yet, would you consider mirroring your posts elsewhere?
Obviously, there's other means of supporting you and Peter, like your Patreon, and I'm not *demanding* that you let me pay you differently just so *i* can have a clean conscience. But I figured that your readers should probably voice their problems with the platform that hosts you, if they have any.
I thought about this while writing my first set of replies. In this specific case, I would argue that Google, Amazon, Meta & co. have all reached such extreme levels of profits and overall influence that they are too large to completely escape from. Whereas Substack has not.
0 reposts0 likes
I understand that building your platform must have taken years of tremendous effort, and you depend greatly on your writing reaching your audience. But we are not yet at a point that Substack has absorbed the near-totality of online writing into itself, or where only they can sustain such a service.
Fostering a new place for your writing and audience does not require you to burn everything that got you to where you are now, but it would better equip you for a day in which you *could* divest from Substack in a more substantial way. If your answer is to do nothing, I doubt that day will ever come