Post

๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ต๐˜ด ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ป๐˜บ-๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ค๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ด ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜‹๐˜–๐˜” ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ, ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜บ ๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜บ๐˜ฏ๐˜ค ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ Yes lazy, and LATE because it can only run AFTER all DOM is parsed ๐˜ž๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ด๐˜ฐ ๐˜ข๐˜ถ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜บ ๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜บ ๐˜ธ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฃ ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ณ ๐˜š๐˜š๐˜™ ๐˜ฃ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ SSR?! then use the platform! <๐™จ๐™˜๐™ง๐™ž๐™ฅ๐™ฉ ๐™™๐™š๐™›๐™š๐™ง/๐™–๐™จ๐™ฎ๐™ฃ๐™˜/๐™ข๐™ค๐™™๐™ช๐™ก๐™š>

LATE is sometimes preferable depends where/when a component might be used, using <script> for everything can clog the pipes (i don't know what they mean by SSR bundle, don't think that is shipped to the browser?)

We don't scan the source in SSR, merely template it together: we'd need to add another step to detect what custom elements are being used. It ought to improve things, but it's on my "to implement and benchmark later" list: caching and progressive enhancement means I expect it to be very minor.