Post

Flood the new your times with message on all their socials and phone calls shaming them.

When they use voting machines to count ballots it’s bad. When you have paper ballots it’s bad. Methinks the methods isn’t the problem, but rather that voting against them is considered to be the crime.

Republicans ranting about the time it takes to count votes in California should apply the same standards to releasing the Epstein files.

🤬

QUIT GIVING THESE FOR-PROFIT COMPANIES ATTENTION AND ENGAGEMENTS. WHY IS IT SHOCKING TO ANYONE THESE PEOPLE ALIGN THEIR BANK ACCOUNTS AND POCKETS WITH REPUBLICANS GREED?!?! We are stupid to keep giving these platforms views

@nytimes.com WTAF is wrong with you!

SCOTUS is corrupt and cannot be trusted to follow precedent, the law or the will of the people.

Fox news would say. Bunch of outside agitators trying to stir up some anger or something to that effect. Republicans are a minority here. Of course they're going to lose. Unlike Trump and his gold plated junk, California has, since it's founding, always been the Golden State.

This is how the media gives false claims “legs”: NBC News this week: 1. Lead with, “Pres Trump claims fraud”, making a lie a story 2. Note claims “lack evidence” rather than “are false” 3. Press CA official, “why does count take so long”, thereby validating underlying premise of the false claims.

The NY Times has never been for 'we, the people!'

AND, we are right with you Marc. TY 💙🇺🇸

Not my usual way of expressing myself, but… FUCK the New York Times!!! @nytimes.com

As well, there are Republican-approved election observers who monitor the entire process. Nothing is done in secret. They are not reporting irregularities.

no society in history has ever been failed by an institution more completely than the american people have been failed by the sycophantic stenography drones of our collaborationist court media (nyt division) none of this would be happening without their complicity

Wyoming typically sees around 130,000 to 165,000 total votes cast in a gubernatorial primary election. California is at around 4.5 million votes in this primary. It takes a little longer to count a big state compared to a small state.

Trump thinks all voting should occur on one day. California has 23 million registered voters. If you wanted them all to vote on the same day they would need 26,000 polling locations. Typically, about 9 million vote for midterm = 10,000 locations.

Adolph Ochs is rolling over in his grave.

WTAF NYT?!

In the 1970s and 80s, I read The New York Times, every day, all of it. Stayed up late Saturday night so I could pick up the Sunday Times as soon as section A was available. Then I spent Sunday absorbing it all. Now, I wouldn't even use it to pick up dogshit.

The Times editorial board can simply FOAD.

It's only wrong if you want to rig the election by not hand counting paper ballots and rely on tech oligarchs to hack the software.

Christ, I swear the biggest flaw that will bring the US down is simply impatience. Impatience for science. Impatience for diplomacy. Impatience for Democracy to work. Impatience with our neighbors different than us. Impatience for money. Impatience to learn, to do art, to get things done right.

So, MAGA wants to do away with machines and go to a full paper ballot......but still bitch because counting paper ballots take time. MAGA logic is NO logic.

Depending on The NY Times to present fair and independent reporting is the first mistake.

Taking “a week to count votes” is NOT doing it wrong, it’s following CA election laws.

Imagine Democrats and a demo president lecturing Repub controlled Texas on how to count its votes.

The New York Times is Trump’s follower.

CA makes it easy to cast a ballot, BUT there is plenty of backend verification. The local post office sat on my husband's ballot until election day (assholes). He went and cast an in person vote. That vote was recorded, the mail in was discarded, no fraud, no problem.