Post
In her dissent, Justice Jackson wrote: "Importantly, this so-called “Purcell principle” arose in a particular context, and this Court has yet to fully define its limits."
10 reposts41 likes
Jackson: "I respectfully dissent because—even, and perhaps especially, when an election is looming—I would not disturb a clearly justifiable federal-court order issued to ensure that the public receives accurate information about a State’s electoral processes." Full story: demdock.com/4z0b3gZ
demdock.comSupreme Court lets New Hampshire fully ban student IDs for voting ahead of midtermsJustice Ketanji Brown Jackson stressed that the lower court’s order did not rewrite New Hampshire law but sought to stop state officials from misleading voters about what the law permits.