@danabra.mov has been on a bit of a tear with a really good mantra: "we can just do things". It feels like there's something in the air as of late, too - tooling, community, and network effects feel like they're finally hitting an inflection point in ATProto. Can we get at it with data? π§΅
Post
Someone gets excited about ATProto. Creates app.coins.coin, creates app.coins.sleeve to hold them in a digital sleeve. Gives up after a few users try it, its just not the right storage, ecosystem, what have you. We'd expect to see *lots* of these if this was a dead ecosystem. If we don't... its live
In fact, 80% of non-BSky collections are under active development with records written in the last week - 90% in the last month. Almost *no* abandoned projects where more than a small handful of uptake. The ecosystem is ~sticky~. Why?
5 reposts61 likes
This is the same thing @danabra.mov is getting at - "we can just build things". In ATProto, the cold start problem is easy. Getting some users is easy, we all have a passport to each other's apps. Booting with some content, some social graph, etc, is native. Also, no postgres - just an app, *now*.
Adding on it, a rabid community. @graze.social went viral because @natalie.sh saw feeds emitting with our domain name, and shared it in the dev community. We all see each others work, and we're actively looking to build together. Once you're on the map, you're on the team, and working together.
@skylight.social needs feeds? @graze.social has 'em - already. Need an integration on @leaflet.pub to add an RSVP widget? Use @smokesignal.events. Every integration confers squared benefits to the ecosystem, not linear improvements in isolation. The ecosystem moves faster *every day*, together.
So, @danabra.mov's right - "we can just do things". We can build off each others work, and as an *unintentional byproduct* from this common carriage network, lift one another's projects out of obscurity, rapidly. We work as one vast company of thousands, together, faster than any single org can go.