Post

I did a research project on legendary child prodigies and found that the secret sauce was having parents who provided them with the best musical education possible and connections to a professional network that gave them opportunities That’s it that’s the secret, it’s just access

This post is unavailable.

25 reposts129 likes

In high school, I shared the band room after hours with fraternal twin prodigies. The sister played violin (DMA Julliard) and brother cello (MM Julliard) and both played for the NEC Youth Repertory Orchesta. They formed a trio with their dad, a pianist, who was the driving force behind his kids.

Much success in any activity, whether it’s music, art (drawing, painting, sculpture, etc.), sports, acting, etc., is largely a function of the opportunities that families are willing and able to provide by way of doing the research in order to discover and seize opportunities for their children.

I used my connections in the music industry to get my eldest son an excellent clarinet teacher through a major conservatory. They just had a lesson this morning. He’s not a prodigy, but he’s doing very well. Knowledge is power, and I leveraged my deep knowledge of music to find a great teacher.

Amen. I was the poor kid in art school. I had to drop out halfway through my second semester. I ran completely out of money, didn't qualify for anything, and no one wanted to help. I got A's the first A's I had ever gotten. My portfolio is limited because my supplies are limited. šŸ˜®ā€šŸ’ØšŸ˜¤šŸ˜®ā€šŸ’Ø

I look at the open mic nights which our daughters’ school runs; 2 solid hours of talent from a population of around 600 (and they have competitive auditions). Every school in the country probably has similar levels of talent; it’s just the opportunity/encouragement that’s missing.

All of them, according to contemporary accounts, had the normal traits of bright kids as laid out in modern child psychology texts. What turned them into ā€œgeniusesā€ was their environment, ie parents who seized on these elements of basic giftedness and cultivated them with a single-minded zeal

Because so many of these ā€œgeniusesā€ came from fathers who didn’t make it big in music and wanted their kids to succeed in their own thwarted ambitions…it’s basically daddy issues all the way down

Wheeeeeee starting to get replies from guys going ā€œbut if you give a kid access without talent then they won’t become greatā€ and that is 1) so fkn obvious, guys, good job, and 2) irrelevant if the dataset you’re working with is talented kids. On this topic we are operating with talent being a given!

Thesis: WA Mozart was a tremendously talented kid who only became ā€œMozartā€ bc his dad created the conditions for him to succeed Reply guys: oooOOOOH but what if a kid ISN’T talented, then they CAN’T become Mozart even with the right conditions and your thesis is wrong! I am very smart!

I'm sure that this plays a tremendously important role, but then, I'm sure there were other kids who had that access, had equally pushy parents, and didn't turn into geniuses. I think that this is maybe necessary, but not sufficient...

I realize this is on me for not like, posting the entire research paper, but what I was getting at was that talent without access won’t go anywhere. The existence of talent, when your pool is purely ā€œchild prodigies/geniuses *who succeeded*ā€ IS A GIVEN bsky.app/profile/dood...

šŸŽ¹ sharon su@doodlyroses.com

All of them, according to contemporary accounts, had the normal traits of bright kids as laid out in modern child psychology texts. What turned them into ā€œgeniusesā€ was their environment, ie parents who seized on these elements of basic giftedness and cultivated them with a single-minded zeal