Post

And these aren’t “potential” conflicts of interest. The study authors: •donated > $7,000 to UCP •make money from private AB government contracts •all work for the AB govt, except one •have taken ‘speaking fees’ from govt-sponsored conferences •failed to report even one of these ☝️in the disclosures

Euan Thomson@drugdatadecoded.ca

Main issue with that RD News Now story and most other reporting on this study is they ignore the conflicts of interest. Yesterday's CBC piece mentioned them but didn't explain. Why focus narrowly on methodology when it's clear the authors had no business publishing on this? Media need to step up.

31 reposts65 likes

For comparison, here is the study’s declaration of interests. It’s fraud, and it’s changing the course of history with the help of uncritical media.

Here’s the Free Press columnist Niigan Sinclair the other night on APTN, casting doubt on the premier’s decision to stall the consumption site opening, before this discussion of Alberta’s fraudulent study reached the conversation there: bsky.app/profile/aptn...

APTN News@aptnnews.bsky.social

The Manitoba government promised Canada's first Indigenous-led supervised consumption site during its first term and now Premier Wab Kinew is backing away and offering no timeline. On this week's Truth & Politics we discuss this lack of timeline and more.