Post

The best answer is "This is politics. Sports are games. Unless the sports leagues are doing something that violates the law, we don't need to step in. Play what you want, be who you want. It shouldn't matter to anyone but you."

Finally, SOMEONE cares about the dragons! 🥹

Wait! Dragons are dying of fentanyl now??

@abdulelsayed.bsky.social has slapped down those trans questions. Check out his interview with Jesse Waters. He made him look like a fool.

And don’t forget about the pressing need for unicorn leash laws.

You should cite posts like this when you tell them that.

SAVE THE DRAGONS!

Ok, but those people were never going to vote democrat in the first place. You're essentially saying that human rights are a losing issue for democrats. Which is silly. That's a silly thing to say. Because people like having human rights.

Also, one could argue “if there are no trans women attempting to play in pro womens sports, than why the pushback for leagues that want to codify a ban?” I.e. who cares if a restaurant says “no dragons high on fentanyl will be served here.”

I work in rec hockey. USA Hockey enforces a Participant Eligibility Policy that bars transgender women from participating in sex-restricted female hockey categories. Pros sports isn’t “real world”. Dems need a unified statement of value. If fear of “gotcha” is too much, call it quits.

Absofuckinglutely.

I do think this is a good constructive critique. Few handle the framing of these questions well. Few are equipped enough to push back. Im open to this being imperfect, but I support a dialogue that doesnt open the door to misinformation and false evidence being dumped on the candidate in response

Flawed though he undoubtably was, “don’t play games with me kid” remains the template.

Well said.