Post

People who are generally upset with how their lives are going, and also feel there are too many people around who look different, can never actually be appeased. Not by Brexit, not by eliminating FoM, not by new taxes or fees, not by ending ILR, not by denaturalizing not by anything.

Absolutely this, patronising/heartless/arrogant/[insert inaccurate metropolitan elite-type smear of your choice] as it might wrongly appear. As I implied yesterday in a longer exchange, the act of voting itself is the hit, and like all drugs, it doesn't satiate, and Labour can't match Reform's hit.

Alistair King@alistairking.bsky.social

I think the point (if I’m right in this unprovable analysis!) is that some of these voters don’t care about the consequences. Their motivation is how casting that vote makes them feel.

I think a gentler way to describe it is that voters aren't choosing from a menu of policy options, but selecting from among representatives they feel best align with their values, priorities and fears. You can't policy-tinker your way to a brand.

2 reposts38 likes

That’s so spot on, mate. Yet we’re doomed to focus group vomited ‘brand building.’ The curse of the politicians believing communications is superior to competency or reason. ‘I’m shit at my job but can talk a good game’ is going to be the death of all of us.

However one phrases it, this is the fundamental truth American Democrats – both moderate and progressive – have tended to fail to grok for decades. Their knee-jerk solution to every concern is a 25 page policy platform. Regardless of one's opinion of whether the proposals will actually help...

...(worth remembering here that protectionism was a staple of lefty and pro-union Dems in the pre-MAGA era) it's basically been a story of Missing the Point. The two Dems who most Got It – Clinton and Obama – are the two most popular Presidents since the end of the Cold War...

...While charisma no doubt had something to do with that, so did at least some perception by various flavours of swing voters that they were trustworthy non-radicals – contra, say, Bernie, who Gets It bit whose history of relative radicalism (socialism+Cuban honeymoon+still not a Democrat)...

...probably always made it too steep of an uphill climb. Time will tell if AOC can continue positioning herself as a non-radical; in the meantime it looks like Pritzker Gets It more than other 2028 hopefuls. This wasn't meant as a thread so sorry about all the ellipses.

Yes, I think that's fair. And don't get me wrong: how my vote makes me feel because of who I'm voting for and the party they're in is a factor that influences my vote too. It's just that it's secondary and a sort of positive side-effect that I look forward to. Consequences and policies matter.