Post

Agree with the central premise about regulation but I'm not sure how regulation can stop people mis-using AI. AI is great for an exec summary of a 5000 word piece one has just written but finding a good path through a mountain range? Seriously? We need a whole mindset change re the use of AI.

Fun fact: The chemical plants along the ship channel in Houston have NEVER been in compliance with the environmental regulations. The were grandfathered in the original law and didn't have to comply until substantially rebuilt. So they rebuilt in smallish sections. For decades.

Some people will die in car accidents anyways, so why bother with airbags and seat belts?

If regulation on technology intended to reduce unethical use was actually pointless, big tech executives wouldn’t be spending massive amounts of time and energy trying to squash those regulations and the people who advocate for them.

I HOPE people see the dangers in AI, because the ones out there right now have no ethics and no guardrails.

Harm reduction with youth and young adults should be a priority, and its not.

Ah but that's much less profitable, you see

@skyview.social please unroll

It is wild to me to see so many people around me pushing for AI status quo while calling those of us who say no, it's not good for popular use yet, it needs more work, luddites in way of progress. Surely working the kinks out of, and putting guardrails around, it *is* progress?