Post

The problem is costs stacked on costs. City Council required bike lanes to only be installed on good pavement. Repaving adds $1M/mile. The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) says when repaving, curb ramps have to be fixed. Another $600k/mile.

The workaround: Large Asphalt Repair (LAR), a long patch the city calls maintenance - no need to fix curb ramps. Put LAR under the bike lanes, leave the rest of the asphalt untouched, and install the bike lanes cheaply. I was outraged by these patches at first. Now I think they’re an important tool.

0 reposts3 likes

But HLA defeats the workaround. It’s triggered by "any paving project or other modification" at least ⅛ mile long. The bike lane itself is a modification. And if a street is in a pedestrian district (2/3 of potential bike lanes in Central LA), that means fixing curb ramps - the ADA all over again.

HLA requires ALL Mobility Plan elements to be installed when repaving, including for pedestrians. The complete street. It’s like a restaurant set menu. Nice for a special occasion. But if my family had to order an appetizer and dessert every time we went to Olive Garden, we'd go a lot less often.

I would just add to your 3rd recommendation (which I support): repeal no-new-bikeways-except-where-pavement-is-good. LADOT already breaks this law - or I should say selectively enforces this law mainly to shoot down bike safety projects

Has anyone done a thorough investigation into the costs? Also has anyone done design reviews? Not to say anything would sway an antagonistic admin but there seem to be real issues even when the work is being done. I’m watching 1 crew do all the intersections on Los Feliz BLVD…