Post

I mean, in 2010 the commentariat had all just cum so hard from their public whipping of Gordon Brown for calling one of the Herrenvolk "bigoted", of course they were gonna see Farage & UKIP and that "legitimate concerns" rhetoric as an endless source of ever bigger & better sadism orgasms for them

flyingrodent@flyingrodent.bsky.social

It’d be better than what we did do: tell the public that anyone who said this hated them and Britain, and that they were themselves terrifyingly racist; then e.g. have Alan Johnson tell them they’re mung bean-chewing hippy wankers who should fuck off on TV, while our best-paid commentators cheered.

7 reposts28 likes

It's wild to me that anybody still imagines that "legitimate concerns" rhetoric to have ever been in any way, shape or form an attempt to *combat* the far-right. People who say, "We need to accept the Nazis see the problem correctly, even if we dispute their solutions," are just cryptofascists.

We need to just assume that any member of the chattering classes coming out with that "legitimate concerns" wank is just a poshcunt with a Herrenvolk fetish, a sort of naziphilia targeted specifically on the working class, like Maurice's hard-on for Scudder if Scudder was a blackshirt thug.

It's a humiliation kink but in a bad sadistic and abusive way, getting off on the abject humiliation of any other member of the ruling elite or any *aspirant* to such status putting themself forward as a victim by saying, "No, nazis are bad, actually," or anything along those lines.

Anytime anyone says "legitimate concerns" in a tone of solemn sensible consideration rather than spitting it with utter scorn and derision, you need to understand that it just gives them such a tingle in their privates, they can't resist it, they want the fascism so bad, it just gets them so wet.