Post

Cars are one of the reasons why cities get so much hotter. An average gasoline car can produce 3.9 MJ of waste heat for *every kilometre* it drives. That’s enough to raise the temperature of a 665 sqft apartment twenty degrees centigrade.

mass.streetsblog.orgExhaust Pipes Are Making Heat Waves Much, Much Worse - Streetsblog MassachusettsThe long-term climate impacts of the climate pollution from cars and trucks are well documented, but the daily short-term effects of the wasted heat energy radiating from engine blocks and exhaust pip...

73 reposts181 likes

How does this heat waste (heat production) compare to people's heat waste from heating your home, heating water in your home, etc.? (Take Toronto, or some other city, typical driving distance, given outdoor climate etc.) Just a round figure: is it 1-5-10-20-30% of people's average heat emission?

Like cars, it depends on the source of energy. Fossil fuel heating (eg natural gas) create heat from chemicals. But electric heat pumps don’t. They move heat energy around like a reversible refrigerator. One is literally burning something for energy while the other is moving existing energy around.

heat.neheat.ne

I know the basics. But I was asking for a general message based on large numbers, kind of If you live in Toronto, heat your average home with (oil) (heat pump) (direct electricity) and drive 50 miles/day, then the driving amounts to .... etc.

The problem with worrying about waste heat is it is so insignificant compared to captured solar energy from greenhouse gases. We’ve got 12 nuclear bombs a second of ocean warming from a small amount of CO2, and people are shutting down green nuclear in France for heating a river w/ fish. Priorities!

Yeah, as much as I love Streetsblog and as much as I hate cars of all kinds, the direct heating effect of combustion is a sideshow at best, compared to the greenhouse consequences and even compared to direct heating of road surfaces by sunlight.

Oh yeah, and it’s real, try parking at a truckstop sometime at 105f with every truck blowing out hot side of AC and engine heat. It’s like 130f. But once you see the scale of global warming, wow. Good news is it’s driven by awesome power of sun we can harness to solve it.

The reason why this happens is because gasoline is literally concentrated chemical energy. And a gas engine literally ignites that fuel to produce heat and pressure in order to turn the pistons that create thrust.

Even the best gas car is very inefficient at converting the chemical energy in gasoline into useful energy. Nearly all fossil fuel engines use less than 50% of the energy stored in gasoline into actual useful stuff. The rest is waste heat. (It’s why all gas cars have heaters but not cooling)

In comparison, electric vehicles run at about 90-95% efficiency. So they will produce far less direct heating to the environment around them. That doesn’t solve, however, the problem with pavement, stores heat energy and can be 20-25º centigrade hotter than the air temperature around it.

Notable: coal, oil, natural gas, and nuclear all produce significant excess heat. Each of these use stored energy to boil water in order to create steam to turn a turbine. Thats heat. Hydro and wind turn turbines without steam. And solar converts sunlight directly to electricity.

A radically efficient vehicle engine is 40% efficient. The most efficient vehicle engine is barely over 51% efficient. There's like only one engine that does that. The rest of the niche of peak efficiency engines are still barely above 40%.

Admitting an AI analysis: Gas compared to EV over 100km. Total Heat Released to Atmosphere Gas ~235.0 MJ EV ~65.0 MJ This includes power production and transportation of energy. For those who charge using renewables only: EV ~19 MJ Sound plausible?

After being distracted, busy, and struggling to find reliable sources, I finally finished my analysis: Per 100km, total heat released from driving: Average gas vehicle: 462.52 MJ Average EV (3.6 mi/kWh): 101.39 MJ An EV charged exclusively with renewables: 72.42 MJ

I want to put together a coherent document on how I calculated this, such as the 20-45% discrepancy between how the EU advertises fuel efficiency and real-world data, and how it's difficult to find efficiency of an EV expressed as a true system efficiency instead of relative to the battery size.

The MJs AI spit out is heat lost per 100km. Thus 2.3 per km for gas which is smaller than the 3.9 originally posted. Of course the numbers will change based on driving habits and efficiency of a particular vehicle. More interesting are the differences in the percentages between the ICE and the EV.

This is why I started by finding the minimum MJ required to drive a distance. There are many estimates, just accepting the efficiency implied by the article is a bad starting place. (For what it's worth, assuming a 22 mpg vehicle, their calculation states the average engine efficiency is 33.7%.)

It tends to radically overestimate small values and underestimate larger values, which throws off such calculations. I am currently looking up information to make sure I do an accurate calculation and then I will reply with that.

I am certain you are significantly incorrect because you're saying 30% less energy than the thing you're replying to, while trying to account for the whole system instead of a local effect. Your number should be higher, not lower. That alone should tell you it's wrong.