Post

The Trump DOJ citing the *preamble* to a 1993 federal law about voter registration for the proposition that Trump can demand that federal judges preemptively overturn an election result is, even in Trump DOJ-adjusted terms, one of the craziest legal arguments I've ever read

ballsandstrikes.orgThis Might Be the Trump DOJ’s Stupidest Legal Argument YetIn Alaska, Trump lawyers are now functionally rewriting federal statutes and hoping judges won't notice.

27/10/26, 9:00 pm17 reposts73 likes

mandysueinla@bsky.social

@mandysueinla.bsky.social

I love how stoopid they are.

Prophesy Not Punditry

@danlb.bsky.social

Yes, any statute that includes “integrity” as one of its purposes allows the DOJ to get any injunction it wants in the name of “integrity.”

tellmeitsgonnabeok.bsky.social

@tellmeitsgonnabeok.bsky.social

Next we will hear from a couple "respected" law professors who rush out a "scholarly" article in some Federalist publication and then the 5th Circuit will say, that's genius.

mandysueinla@bsky.social

@mandysueinla.bsky.social

Like Dershowitz