Post

I think "nothing" is better, so Daniel has to look at it first and waste time doing so. I trust Daniel to write a prompt.

0 reposts3 likes

I also think it's good that there is a comment about this. At least that makes it transparent. But I fundamentally don't think it's a good idea to try to solve issues with AI code without checking the code yourself, but instead demanding that someone else look at it.

Oh, I understand now. Daniel isn't the one who submitted it, if I understand correctly. Someone else did. The disclaimer is for Daniel, from someone who didn't want him to think it was a from a human. Otherwise Daniel may waste time on it unnecessarily.

Exactly. The main issue isn't that AI is involved as an assisting technology, but the base line should be for a contributor to at least understand the code they deliver and be able to vet its accuracy and be able to react to feedback for possible changes. Still, brave and honest disclaimer!