Post

ACFN's counsel is focused on borders, which is a bit different from how SLCN focused its arguments. Leans heavily on Justice Feasby's decision finding a citizen initiative on independence would breach treaty rights.

An excellent approach. It's laying out the multitude of serious roadblocks and not just one. The macro picture shows how little thought has gone into this ridiculous grievance based desire for a referendum very few people want.

ACFN counsel is getting into the history of the Citizen's Initiative Act, which was reviewed by a citizen committee. That committee's fear was “that the will or tyranny of the majority may be used as the means to harm the rights and freedoms of a minority group" ...