Post

and just in time to flop this from a private market crisis to a state-run three-ring circus fiasco, it's marc a! bsky.app/profile/wash...

The Washington Post@washingtonpost.com

Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh has enlisted Marc Andreessen — the billionaire investor, adviser to President Trump and one of Silicon Valley’s most aggressive promoters of AI — to help shape how the central bank thinks about the technology’s impact.

Excellent piece. I have been collecting similar stories of LLM stupidity, many of which you cite. I appreciate your putting so much into a cohesive narrative, which now goes into my collection.

I can vouch for Claude's ability to generate code that usually works well enough, and a lot faster than I can write it. I'm still not sure this is improving my productivity all that much, but it does make it possible to write UI code I would never touch at all. I agree that the hype is overblown.

I mean yeah, software is cool. Compilers are cool. some of the automation tricks are useful. But it still isn't sentient or magic or a symmetrical replacement for human brains. It's also not affordable. And it's destroying the climate. So...

The sentience issue is an interesting one because LLMs pass the Turing test at this point by reasonable criteria. Turing said nothing about consciousness though. His 1950 paper holds up well, but I think he might be surprised. What they lack is any kind of self-sensing loop, so there is ...

... no conceivable mechanism for the qualia of consciousness, not even Hofstadter's "strange loop", which is as plausible as anything. Whatever they're doing (essentially high dimensional curve fitting) it is not based on introspection. I say this as someone eager to see machine consciousness. ...

hard to say given the level of corruption and logic-impermeability of the memestock movement, but I suspect later this year or early next We'll see