Post
You can read their jeremiad in full here. The DOJ fully supports continuing to call Halligan a U.S. Attorney, despite a binding ruling that she is not one. They attack the Trump appointed judge for calling that possible professional misconduct. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
storage.courtlistener.comstorage.courtlistener.com
To put it mildly, this isn't the type of language one typically sees by a party addressing a judge. Halligan, Blanche and Bondi downplay the ruling disqualifying Halligan as a "disagreement" with the government, which they say isn't binding on any other case.
36 reposts257 likes