Post

@markjacob.bsky.social

The NY Times saves its harshest skepticism for progressives. Instead of being impressed by 3,000+ coordinated protests, NYT dismisses the value of “hitting a number” and asks if No Kings will be “a primal scream that fades into a whimper.” F off, NY Times. We'll defeat fascism w/o you. (Gift link)

nytimes.comA Challenge for ‘No Kings’ Protests, the Third Time Around

@markjacob.bsky.social

Last October in my free weekly newsletter, I wrote about how the NY Times botched coverage of Trump's mentally deranged video post about No Kings.

stopthepresses.newsMedia must cover — not cover up — Trump’s unfitnessThe president benefits from the failure to focus on his broken brain

@jimmyo13.bsky.social

It feels like @nytimes.com has given up on our democracy and simply pledge fealty to the Dicktater in DC.

They are, after all, run by fellow Epstein files alumni.

28/3/26, 5:00 pm0 reposts4 likes

No replies yet.