Post

Trump sewed up his asshole

The oligarch media are going to publish propaganda and nothing else. Why are you confused about this?

What some call “botching”, others might call “disinformation”

Let’s face it, the NYT turned into a rag. Also, I hate AI.

👏👏

He's bankrupting the country seeking revenge and building monuments to his ego. Meanwhile, the press skulks about, averting all glances, hoping no one notices their tail curving down between their legs. It's a sorry state of affairs.

The folks who don't read or listen to the reports on current events are Trump +20 🤦‍♂️ His beloved & legendary "poorly educated"

exactly, call a spade a spade it's a fucking regime nazi collaborator newspaper- get everyone to disavow it. If you enable this shit, good luck- say goodbye to the US as a democracy.

They are, after all, run by fellow Epstein files alumni.

Agreed

That’s my take.

Current and previous publishers were Epstein buddies, pro Americans torturing people, and they drove The Onion to write this theonion.com/it-is-journa... more than 3y ago, and they're worse now!

Indeed, Judith Miller didn’t recover from that propaganda but lots of Bush folks should have been held accountable for that fabricated war.

If democracy means that A.G. Sulzberger has to be assaulted with some 20-something's pronouns then it is democracy that must be sacrificed.

Anyone in ANY kind of responsible position- doctor, pilot, CEO, manager of a McDonald's franchise- who posted rants like his would & should be immediately removed from their position. And yet he's sending us to war & wrecking our economy. And Congressional Republicans keep failing at their jobs.

Journalists refuse to admit that they are just a tool for oligarchs. The NYT didn’t botch shit, they support Trump.

Say they botched it is a pretty generous take honestly

Despite them, not just without them.

Infuriating. How much ink did it spill on 5 Tea Party dudes cosplaying in revolutionary gear during the Obama administration? How many diner articles trying to understand racists hiding behind “economic anxiety”? Instead we get her emails, Biden’s age, and dissing #NoKings.

Eat shit @newyorktimeshaiku.bsky.social

They are an embarrassment in the Age of Trump.

NYT is not on our side

Abolish the fucking times, I'm not joking, complete and total abolishment,

I have a vivid memory of the “F-15 protests” on Feb. 15, 2004, in the run up to the Iraq War. With protests in 800 cities, it was the largest global protest in human history at the time. The NYT put it on something like A17. The American media was all in on the war and obvious WMD lie.

You know what’s fading into a whisper? The New York Times.

The NYTIMES is compromised! Fascist take over is complete.

#no_kings #no_wars #trump_epstein_files #epstein_fuel_tax #pedophile_trump #pedophile_prince_andrew #felon_trump #rapist_trump #pedophile_musk #pedophile_zuckerberg #hooker_melania #barron_jeffery_epstein #bondi_bitch

here are some NYT headlines 16 years ago Tea Party Lights Fuse for Rebellion on Right (February 15, 2010) Tea Party Group Issues Warning to the GOP (February 26, 2011) Poll Finds Tea Party Backers Wealthier and More Educated (April 14, 2010)

Here’s a better article. www.theguardian.com/us-news/live...

Cancelled the Times during the last Presidential election. Saw the writing on the wall. There’s better places to get news & opinions…

“the millions of people THEY said turned out in June.” Oh fuck off.

NYT consistently gets it wrong these days.

Right Says the the once proudest of our fading and failing mainstream media

I'm with you. They should be ashamed of themselves.

Actually as much as I hate the nyt for being the American fascist mouthpiece of record, it is good to criticize the no kings protest. protest without specific demands is literally "virtue signalling" as loathe as I am to use that term. No Kings is a nice idea, but the lack of focus is of concern.

We need to SMASH it to pieces.

Good to remember.

NY times is fascist so "we will defeat nazis and nytimes altogether"

Fuck off, indeed.

Honestly, if MAGA somehow managed 1/10 this level of organization it would be front page news for a week and the declaration of a permanent gop majority.

The @nytimes.com thinks that saying something negative and undermining makes it sound intelligent.

The Obama administration, staffed by centrists and light republicans, continued to bail out Wallstreet to the detriment of Main Street after a non-policed Wallstreet engaged in historic amounts of fraud and asset inflation during Bush II. Consult @ddayen.bsky.social for details.

Garbage in, garbage out: @nytimes.com

Find a rally near you: NoKings.org Saturday March 28 🚫👑 In case anyone needs a WHY to join ⬇️ next.frame.io/share/d12e59...

At war with consensus forming on Trump.

Aren’t there some really odious headlines/articles from NYT back in the day where they downplayed the Nazis? They are who they have always been. Snooty, arrogant, holier than thou with no sense of justice or empathy

Not sorry nyt is a rag

Pedos rule the earth Burn oil to burn the children

Only D-bags whimper, Germy.

All you have to do is contrast Peter's breathless coverage of the small astro-turfed Tea Party events with his No Kings "even large numbers of people may really still be a failure" to see his and the NY Times' bias.

Jeremy Peters, no surprise.

I don't understand how one could work at the Times and not be, personally, in the streets today.

Jeremy Peters is a worthless read, his words are akin to the health benefits of sugar, none, except for the people who he so desperately wants to maintain a relationship with in order to maintain his lazy unhealthy form of access journalism, which really isn’t journalism, it’s propaganda, garbage

No mention anywhere of Erica Chenoweth's 3.5% rule (Nonviolent protests involving at least 3.5% of the population have never failed to bring about change), which would have at least added a research-based element to a story based on speculation.

Then stop paying for this shit lmao

I guess we’ll have to storm The Capital for us to take us seriously.

I could trace a line between Occupy Wall Street and the coffee shop unions for instance that have grown since then. I can get more into that point later, but trajectory of social movements is that big flashy things lead to smaller, more focused things. That's what we need to look for.

lol. They closed the comments as the always do with this kind of bullshit article. Cowards.

Jeremy Peters covered the Tea Party protests. I bet if 12 random people showed up for one of those he would have called it the biggest political movement in history

A disgrace in journalism @nytimes.com #JeremyPeters @agsulzberger.bsky.social

When we're passionate, it's because we're "deranged." When Republicans are passionate, it's because of their deeply felt Christian beliefs. This is so widely understood and accepted that it doesn't need saying, especially at the NYT. Thanks for the gift link. The Wordle paper is not worth a dime.

They want this mass rebellion to act like a political party I guess. Buy commercials on YouTube send out mailers etc. This is not that. This is a swelling anger that comes from the gut. Pointing out there are a lot of white educated women apparently means to this jerk that it’s not sustainable. FU.

Even if the Wikipedia page is gone, Murc's Law lives on!

They're still bent about Mamdani being mayor of NYC.

Weasel wonking.

The Fucking NYT is Fash aligned

Pretty easy to guess the byline here.

We see you New York Times and we’re sick of it.

Why read such woodenly power-serving unimaginative author when you also can read eminent historian (and now also activist) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy... snyder.substack.com bsky.app/profile/timo... ?

Just looked at the lede story on the home page: "a portrait of Trump at war." They just can't quit the biggest loser. (Two protests I've been to went right past HQ & they still ignored 'em.)

The Grey Lady will disdain the resistance right up until we win, then act as if she was with us all along. Very revealing that they view the goal of a protest to save our country as "hitting a number" and "a primal scream." So much less embarrassing to discuss it at cocktail parties.

They are trying to dampen our enthusiasm. Unfortunately it does work on some. To hell with them. ❌👑

they consider their primary audience to be people with private jets

Thank you, Mark‼️

Again: The Times' effete, elitist leadership simply doesn't care about how much damage the likely pedophile does, as they can easily leave the nation. That's who they are.

Maybe we can take them down with the fascists, since they no longer serve their purpose

The New Trump Times is un-American.

Also thank you for the gift link. And, the fu** off is appropriate in matters such as these.

Thank you for this, Mark. The Chicago Sun Times today, had NOT ONE mention of any No Kings events. Cowards is the nicest word I can think of right now.

after decades of the nyt, who cares. wirecutter is amazon. it has no meaning.

The press has spent the last decade skulking about, averting all glances, and hoping no one notices their tail curving down between their legs as they try not to piddle unconrolably. Maybe, someday, they will get a belly rub and a treat, and not a beating. At least,that seems to be their thinking.

Did North Korean media write this? And to compare the No Kings protests to Jerry Falwell in the 1980s? Several city blocks, comparing it in size to the Tea Party...What a garbage editorial.

Jeremy Peters took a break from the anti-trans beat to write this drivel.

I may have to keep this post from yesterday very handy... bsky.app/profile/nopl...

George Carlin was right about everything. US media functions as a PR tool for the rich. 🤑

OoOOoo fuck these guys can't believe I used to respect their data visualizations

What are the odds @nytimes.com covers the actual event, with pictures, anywhere near its front page? Thinking near zero. With a tepid headline at best. Why is anyone still subscribing to this rag?

I'm so disappointed in this newspaper

I fucking KNEW Jeremy Peters would be the author.

Go to their neighbourhoods with garden implements. I mean; how hard can it be? Oh right; 'America' struggles.

agree- especially the "F-off" part....

That they list numbers in the second paragraph while saying they haven't verified them says quite a bit just by itself. Two nationwide rallies involving hundreds/thousands of protests and you didn't even attempt to figure out a number? Well considering they downplayed them in real time that tracks.

1/3rd of the public will cheer for the end of democracy, 1/3rd won't know what to think or will believe the Trump controlled media. And that last third that knows and cares will be powerless to do anything but wave signs around and yell.

Nytimes is a fascist rag. Look at their reporting over time to include Nazi Germany they downplayed that too…

LMAO! The who?? F that TP! Thats all its good for --> @nytimes.com

The Revolution will not be televised, or brought to you by the New York Times.

“Wet blanket” seems to be the new Republican strategy against protest. Look at any protest post on local subreddits or Facebook pages. It’s all “I’m with you but this won’t do anything and is a waste of time”

So glad I cancelled my subscription to @nytimes.com

Centrists hate progressives. That's why they're a reactionary's best friend.

Won’t read that crap even with a gift link.

Jeremy Peters just sucks

This piece is decent www.nytimes.com/2026/03/28/u... Had to scroll quite a bit to find it. 🎁 🔗

Fuck the NYT, they are GOP in sheep's clothing.

They really need to stop with these opinion pieces and presenting them as if they're factual reporting.

What organizations like the @nytimes.com fail to realize is no one trusts what you report, and your “editorials” have no meaning because they are paid to drink from the tit of Trump’s whimsies.

It’s like they are purposefully trying not to understand.

Agree! Thank you for all your real journalism!

The Times both sides the #NoKing demonstrations as only they can - with arrogance, ignorance and zero curiosity.