Post

Would the Framers, or any sane person, intend for many laws and even some parts of the Constitution (e.g., the Emoluments Clause) to be completely unenforceable due to a universal lack of standing? Article III cannot possibly be less important than a three-part test invented by Scalia in 1992

The Missouri Supreme Court just ruled that the voters' initiative to overturn Republicans' gerrymandered districts was valid and ordered the state to revert to the previous congressional map for November. The state's attorney general vows to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Would she have standing?

Thanks for the info Liz! I still think there needs to be a more effective way for the public to sue the government when we’re the harmed party! So many technical issues.