Post
The acceleration may be partly related to reductions in aerosol pollutants that previously masked a portion of greenhouse gas warming (@drjamesehansen.bsky.social et al. 2025)." Rectifications by media and certain vociferous scientific voices are in order.
7 reposts29 likes
That depends on how you define "admitted".. bsky.app/profile/leon...
There seems to be a discrepancy between the science he co-authors and what he tells journalist or his social media followers.
The increase in forcing stays post-sulphur removal and forcing is still growing? And we still need to remove sulphur (and lots of ammonia).
Hmm. We have grown 850m humans who eat more meat per person and 950m new cars (<6% EV) since Paris. CO2 growth is GROWING. Radiative forcing growth is bad because it acts like a stuck accelerator pedal on heating. If it grows, °C increases will inevitably(!) accelerate. gml.noaa.gov/aggi/aggi.html