Post

Maken Tosch
@makentosch.com

I'm actually ok with this. For now at least. I do understand the grey areas with AI. But I do strongly feel that AI disclosure tags are still necessary. If I visit a world that has AI-gen parts or code, it should only be because I was informed ahead of time. I don't like being deceived.

Maken Tosch
@makentosch.com

Regarding tag, I believe tags should come with additional context. Details such as how much of the scripts were vibe coded, how much of the assets were AI-gen, how much manual post processing was used on the AI-gen parts, and so on.

0 reposts3 likes

Maken Tosch
@makentosch.com

I'm posting my thoughts here because it looks like the survey requires a Google account and I will not sign in to Google just to participate in a survey.

Maken Tosch
@makentosch.com

No. It's the principle of it. Yes, I hate Google that much. But that's a completely separate topic for another day. Right now, the focus is on AI.

Slade
@wolfsangelslade.bsky.social

I will note, as also pointed out in the post, that tagging is a cumbersome ordeal. If we rely soley on the content "creator", a lot wont put tag on, knowing it will hurt their content exposure. Having VrChat somehow police every world, would probably bankrupt them with the amlint of ppl needed.

Maken Tosch
@makentosch.com

You make a good point. It's also already becoming a trend now. So it's better to have a badge of honor than a scarlet letter.

Slade
@wolfsangelslade.bsky.social

This has a somewhat better chance, because a lot of AI users are "proud" of the use, so would less likely tag it as non-ai... Unless they want more reach