Revised! Interactional foundations for critical AI literacies doi.org/10.5281/zeno... Gods speak, spirits speak, computers speak. Oracular ambiguity or statistical probability provides loopholes, and discrepancies are expunged by Faith.” — Ursula K. Le Guin, The Left Hand of Darkness (1969)
Post
Featuring luminaries like @abeba.blacksky.app @wolven.blacksky.app @lucyosler.bsky.social @sarahciston.com @olivia.science @irisvanrooij.bsky.social and classic work by Ada Lovelace, Lucy Suchman, Margaret Boden, Harold Garfinkel, Ellen Langer, Joseph Weizenbaum among many others
One bit I reworked is the section dealing with so-called prompt engineering. Shoutout to Ursula Franklin, whose notion of prescriptive technology is particularly useful to understand how "it is not only the prompt that is being engineered, but also the prompter." More: zenodo.org/records/2136...
I also say a bit more on what a *critical* angle is & why we need it. It's the opposite of fear-mongering about "missing the boat": > To be critical means to question the assumed need to get onto that boat; to ask who built it, who steers it, where it is going, and why it must leave in such a hurry
0 reposts9 likes
and building on a.o. Patricia Collins & Paolo Freire: > To be critical is to combine discernment —an ability to see through and demystify things— with radical intentionality: a readiness to question assumptions, to speak truth to power, and to imagine futures worth wanting doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
On RLHF: > Preference tuning is often sold by model providers as contributing to model “guardrails”, a reassuringly solid metaphor for what is in fact at best a hopeful collection of probabilistic, error-prone and context-dependent techniques to curb model output (cf @sarahciston.com 2026)